Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
17.274193548387096 1 Fresno City 35 124 1596 12.87 635 4296 .224 1439 11.60 2142.0 17.3
16.655 2 Coalinga 29 100 1188 11.88 562 3304 .189 1109 11.09 1665.5 16.7
15.976635514018692 3 Taft 32 107 1270 11.87 414 3418 .250 1151 10.76 1709.5 16.0
15.13586956521739 4 Merced 27 92 1041 11.32 428 3240 .189 928 10.09 1392.5 15.1
14.622881355932204 5 Sequoias 31 118 1281 10.86 444 3788 .221 1111 9.42 1725.5 14.6
12.49438202247191 6 Lemoore 26 89 744 8.36 468 3059 .090 691 7.76 1112.0 12.5
11.08235294117647 7 Porterville 24 85 693 8.15 481 2850 .074 680 8.00 942.0 11.1
10.313953488372093 8 Reedley 26 86 612 7.12 442 2402 .071 600 6.98 887.0 10.3
8.575581395348838 9 Columbia 26 86 417 4.85 368 1960 .025 369 4.29 737.5 8.6
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
2083.0 1 Taft 32 107 2083 19.47 57 233 174 1.62
2026.0 2 Sequoias 31 118 2026 17.17 192 131 258 2.18
1774.0 3 Fresno City 35 124 1774 14.31 46 376 234 1.89
1559.0 4 Coalinga 29 100 1559 15.59 69 203 171 1.71
1473.0 5 Porterville 24 85 1473 17.33 44 100 94 1.11
1380.0 6 Lemoore 26 89 1380 15.51 75 134 142 1.60
1160.0 7 Merced 27 92 1160 12.61 44 139 114 1.23
936.0 8 Reedley 26 86 936 10.88 67 84 109 1.27
896.0 9 Columbia 26 86 896 10.42 103 147 177 2.05
Rk Team m s ta sa sa/s se r re
3.07 1 Coalinga 29 100 - 307 3.07 262 0 0
2.5869565217391304 2 Merced 27 92 - 238 2.59 252 1588 118
2.539325842696629 3 Lemoore 26 89 - 226 2.54 209 1761 202
2.5161290322580645 4 Fresno City 35 124 - 312 2.52 229 2004 195
2.485981308411215 5 Taft 32 107 - 266 2.49 149 111 11
1.930232558139535 6 Reedley 26 86 - 166 1.93 16 64 16
1.8235294117647058 7 Porterville 24 85 - 155 1.82 128 0 0
1.6744186046511629 8 Columbia 26 86 - 144 1.67 171 0 0
1.5847457627118644 9 Sequoias 31 118 - 187 1.58 180 2074 236
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
18.163265306122447 1 Fresno City 16 49 645 13.16 216 1510 .284 598 12.20 890.0 18.2
16.166666666666668 2 Coalinga 16 54 650 12.04 289 1837 .197 598 11.07 873.0 16.2
16.346153846153847 3 Taft 16 52 648 12.46 214 1706 .254 604 11.62 850.0 16.3
15.280701754385966 4 Merced 16 57 648 11.37 255 2076 .189 579 10.16 871.0 15.3
14.448275862068966 5 Sequoias 16 58 647 11.16 223 1952 .217 554 9.55 838.0 14.4
11.8 6 Lemoore 16 55 458 8.33 307 1966 .077 433 7.87 649.0 11.8
10.648148148148149 7 Porterville 16 54 409 7.57 317 1756 .052 411 7.61 575.0 10.6
10.29245283018868 8 Reedley 16 53 374 7.06 268 1453 .073 365 6.89 545.5 10.3
8.509615384615385 9 Columbia 16 52 251 4.83 234 1243 .014 225 4.33 442.5 8.5
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
1057.0 1 Taft 16 52 1057 20.33 31 106 84 1.62
1074.0 2 Sequoias 16 58 1074 18.52 83 60 113 1.95
670.0 3 Fresno City 16 49 670 13.67 12 178 101 2.06
925.0 4 Coalinga 16 54 925 17.13 19 106 72 1.33
910.0 5 Porterville 16 54 910 16.85 34 76 72 1.33
839.0 6 Lemoore 16 55 839 15.25 26 70 61 1.11
765.0 7 Merced 16 57 765 13.42 33 88 77 1.35
498.0 8 Reedley 16 53 498 9.40 46 41 67 1.25
576.0 9 Columbia 16 52 576 11.08 70 103 122 2.34
Rk Team m s ta sa sa/s se r re
2.7962962962962963 1 Coalinga 16 54 - 151 2.80 141 0 0
2.56140350877193 2 Merced 16 57 - 146 2.56 137 1006 74
2.3636363636363638 3 Lemoore 16 55 - 130 2.36 129 1137 117
2.938775510204082 4 Fresno City 16 49 - 144 2.94 108 673 59
2.269230769230769 5 Taft 16 52 - 118 2.27 82 0 0
1.9811320754716981 6 Reedley 16 53 - 105 1.98 0 0 0
1.7407407407407407 7 Porterville 16 54 - 94 1.74 90 0 0
1.3461538461538463 8 Columbia 16 52 - 70 1.35 121 0 0
1.3448275862068966 9 Sequoias 16 58 - 78 1.34 84 990 106