California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
3.5632183908045976 1	San Diego Mesa	27	87	1078	12.39	391	2686	.256	1050	12.07	1568.0	18.0
2.043010752688172 2	Grossmont	27	93	1127	12.12	383	2765	.269	1102	11.85	1447.5	15.6
2.3981481481481484 3	MiraCosta	28	108	1115	10.32	573	3464	.156	1035	9.58	1535.0	14.2
2.0898876404494384 4	Southwestern	25	89	967	10.87	537	3307	.130	902	10.13	1213.0	13.6
2.1707317073170733 5	Palomar	23	82	843	10.28	410	2587	.167	753	9.18	1096.0	13.4
1.9577464788732395 6	San Diego City	22	71	572	8.06	225	1603	.216	520	7.32	845.0	11.9
1.6588235294117648 7	Imperial Valley	24	85	689	8.11	403	3141	.091	596	7.01	896.5	10.5
0.9473684210526315 8	San Diego Miramar	18	57	209	3.67	196	1019	.013	158	2.77	307.0	5.4

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
2.0898876404494384 1	Southwestern	25	89	1649	18.53	29	62	60	0.67
2.3981481481481484 2	MiraCosta	28	108	1538	14.24	38	246	161	1.49
2.043010752688172 3	Grossmont	27	93	1412	15.18	45	171	131	1.40
3.5632183908045976 4	San Diego Mesa	27	87	1264	14.53	100	160	180	2.07
2.1707317073170733 5	Palomar	23	82	1027	12.52	26	98	75	0.91
1.6588235294117648 6	Imperial Valley	24	85	934	10.99	50	33	67	0.78
1.9577464788732395 7	San Diego City	22	71	672	9.46	63	142	134	1.89
0.9473684210526315 8	San Diego Miramar	18	57	421	7.39	36	16	44	0.77

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
3.5632183908045976 1	San Diego Mesa	27	87	310	3.56	61	6
2.3981481481481484 2	MiraCosta	28	108	259	2.40	1828	154
2.1707317073170733 3	Palomar	23	82	178	2.17	88	17
2.0898876404494384 4	Southwestern	25	89	186	2.09	1663	169
2.043010752688172 5	Grossmont	27	93	190	2.04	635	79
1.9577464788732395 6	San Diego City	22	71	139	1.96	177	38
1.6588235294117648 7	Imperial Valley	24	85	141	1.66	1614	160
0.9473684210526315 8	San Diego Miramar	18	57	54	0.95	742	80

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
3.66 1	San Diego Mesa	16	50	639	12.78	211	1553	.276	627	12.54	927.0	18.5
2.7115384615384617 2	Grossmont	16	52	685	13.17	200	1585	.306	672	12.92	897.5	17.3
2.706896551724138 3	MiraCosta	16	58	645	11.12	338	1951	.157	596	10.28	892.0	15.4
1.9642857142857142 4	Southwestern	16	56	632	11.29	321	2092	.149	596	10.64	780.0	13.9
2.1296296296296298 5	Palomar	16	54	561	10.39	263	1729	.172	502	9.30	723.0	13.4
1.9019607843137254 6	San Diego City	16	51	452	8.86	159	1235	.237	419	8.22	656.5	12.9
1.7037037037037037 7	Imperial Valley	16	54	441	8.17	212	1937	.118	405	7.50	576.5	10.7
1.0408163265306123 8	San Diego Miramar	16	49	203	4.14	181	963	.023	152	3.10	290.0	5.9

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1.9642857142857142 1	Southwestern	16	56	1050	18.75	19	38	38	0.68
2.706896551724138 2	MiraCosta	16	58	864	14.90	22	136	90	1.55
2.7115384615384617 3	Grossmont	16	52	870	16.73	26	91	72	1.38
3.66 4	San Diego Mesa	16	50	726	14.52	67	76	105	2.10
2.1296296296296298 5	Palomar	16	54	714	13.22	17	60	47	0.87
1.7037037037037037 6	Imperial Valley	16	54	709	13.13	36	15	44	0.81
1.9019607843137254 7	San Diego City	16	51	514	10.08	47	121	108	2.11
1.0408163265306123 8	San Diego Miramar	16	49	390	7.96	29	14	36	0.73

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
3.66 1	San Diego Mesa	16	50	183	3.66	61	6
2.706896551724138 2	MiraCosta	16	58	157	2.71	953	73
2.1296296296296298 3	Palomar	16	54	115	2.13	0	0
1.9642857142857142 4	Southwestern	16	56	110	1.96	1030	105
2.7115384615384617 5	Grossmont	16	52	141	2.71	278	33
1.9019607843137254 6	San Diego City	16	51	97	1.90	70	9
1.7037037037037037 7	Imperial Valley	16	54	92	1.70	1016	93
1.0408163265306123 8	San Diego Miramar	16	49	51	1.04	683	73