California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Imperial Valley	28	499-1599	31.2	129-474	27.2	129-243	53.1	46.4
46.4 2	Grossmont	28	479-1534	31.2	128-462	27.7	334-532	62.8	50.7
50.7 3	San Diego Mesa	28	546-1600	34.1	125-436	28.7	397-606	65.5	57.7
57.7 4	Southwestern	28	530-1561	34.0	105-471	22.3	262-459	57.1	58.5
58.5 5	San Diego City	28	583-1782	32.7	115-486	23.7	341-576	59.2	59.4
59.4 6	MiraCosta	26	721-1704	42.3	83-359	23.1	240-423	56.7	67.9
67.9 7	Palomar	30	833-2190	38.0	358-1160	30.9	325-505	64.4	78.4

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Southwestern	28	10.4	20.6	31.0	-16.6
-16.6 2	Imperial Valley	28	12.3	22.2	34.5	-8.8
-8.8 3	Grossmont	28	13.0	27.0	40.0	-3.4
-3.4 4	San Diego Mesa	28	13.6	29.2	42.9	7.3
7.3 5	MiraCosta	26	13.8	28.5	42.3	7.6
7.6 6	Palomar	30	18.6	26.4	45.0	9.8
9.8 7	San Diego City	28	19.6	27.0	46.6	5.0

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Palomar	30	14.3	6.4	2.6	16.3
16.3 2	Southwestern	28	19.9	10.8	2.4	9.6
9.6 3	MiraCosta	26	20.0	10.3	2.2	14.8
14.8 4	San Diego Mesa	28	20.6	10.1	2.8	12.1
12.1 5	Imperial Valley	28	20.7	11.2	3.0	10.9
10.9 6	San Diego City	28	26.8	15.9	5.2	12.2
12.2 7	Grossmont	28	29.7	16.9	3.4	9.6

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	28	16.5	0.769	-0.064
-0.064 2	Southwestern	28	17.5	0.798	-0.113
-0.113 3	MiraCosta	26	15.6	0.851	0.153
0.153 4	Grossmont	28	15.9	-	-
- 5	Imperial Valley	28	14.3	-	-
- 5	Palomar	30	18.1	-	-
- 5	San Diego City	28	16.0	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Palomar	30	510-1560	32.7	101-427	23.7	48.6
48.6 2	MiraCosta	26	489-1559	31.4	142-547	26.0	52.8
52.8 3	San Diego Mesa	28	550-1581	34.8	114-422	27.0	56.4
56.4 4	Imperial Valley	28	659-1743	37.8	141-578	24.4	62.5
62.5 5	San Diego City	28	700-1862	37.6	135-452	29.9	64.8
64.8 6	Southwestern	28	647-1739	37.2	141-529	26.7	70.9
70.9 7	Grossmont	28	804-2083	38.6	217-706	30.7	75.5

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	28	13.3	22.3	35.5	7.3
7.3 2	MiraCosta	26	12.4	22.3	34.7	7.6
7.6 3	Grossmont	28	19.1	24.3	43.4	-3.4
-3.4 4	Palomar	30	9.3	25.8	35.2	9.8
9.8 5	San Diego City	28	15.5	26.1	41.6	5.0
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	28	16.4	26.9	43.3	-8.8
-8.8 7	Southwestern	28	16.8	30.8	47.6	-16.6

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	28	16.1	8.9	3.7	11.4
11.4 2	Grossmont	28	17.6	8.0	3.3	18.3
18.3 3	Imperial Valley	28	18.9	10.3	2.3	13.6
13.6 4	MiraCosta	26	21.3	11.0	2.9	10.0
10.0 5	Southwestern	28	22.3	11.1	2.3	13.3
13.3 6	Palomar	30	23.0	13.3	1.8	7.2
7.2 7	San Diego City	28	23.4	11.6	3.3	13.9

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Imperial Valley	28	12.3	-	-
- 2	MiraCosta	26	13.8	0.698	0.153
0.153 3	Palomar	30	15.5	-	-
- 4	Southwestern	28	15.7	0.911	-0.113
-0.113 5	San Diego Mesa	28	16.5	0.833	-0.064
-0.064 6	Grossmont	28	17.6	-	-
- 7	San Diego City	28	19.5	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Imperial Valley	12	188-634	29.7	64-219	29.2	51-91	56.0	44.5
44.5 2	Grossmont	13	227-696	32.6	58-201	28.9	149-243	61.3	50.8
50.8 3	San Diego Mesa	12	245-689	35.6	58-211	27.5	144-227	63.4	57.8
57.8 4	Southwestern	13	258-715	36.1	56-214	26.2	115-172	66.9	61.1
61.1 5	San Diego City	12	203-653	31.1	39-177	22.0	137-242	56.6	52.0
52.0 6	MiraCosta	12	368-827	44.5	32-124	25.8	100-175	57.1	72.3
72.3 7	Palomar	12	342-871	39.3	156-479	32.6	110-175	62.9	79.2

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Southwestern	13	9.6	17.8	27.4	-24.2
-24.2 2	Imperial Valley	12	10.9	18.0	28.9	-10.8
-10.8 3	Grossmont	13	12.4	27.1	39.5	-1.2
-1.2 4	San Diego Mesa	12	12.8	26.9	39.7	9.8
9.8 5	MiraCosta	12	16.4	31.8	48.3	21.6
21.6 6	Palomar	12	16.3	23.8	40.2	8.1
8.1 7	San Diego City	12	16.4	23.6	40.0	-1.2

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Palomar	12	13.9	5.9	1.7	15.2
15.2 2	Southwestern	13	19.7	11.1	2.6	9.6
9.6 3	MiraCosta	12	20.1	8.8	1.9	18.3
18.3 4	San Diego Mesa	12	19.8	10.4	2.8	12.6
12.6 5	Imperial Valley	12	17.8	8.8	1.8	10.5
10.5 6	San Diego City	12	25.5	16.2	5.3	8.2
8.2 7	Grossmont	13	28.7	16.8	3.4	9.8

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	12	16.3	0.782	-0.078
-0.078 2	Southwestern	13	17.8	0.852	-0.003
-0.003 3	MiraCosta	12	13.0	0.906	0.313
0.313 4	Grossmont	13	14.5	-	-
- 5	Imperial Valley	12	13.6	-	-
- 5	Palomar	12	16.8	-	-
- 5	San Diego City	12	14.6	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Palomar	12	152-531	28.6	18-113	15.9	38.8
38.8 2	MiraCosta	12	171-639	26.8	57-242	23.6	43.2
43.2 3	San Diego Mesa	12	238-630	37.8	50-174	28.7	57.3
57.3 4	Imperial Valley	12	269-683	39.4	65-230	28.3	63.3
63.3 5	San Diego City	12	332-813	40.8	77-229	33.6	72.5
72.5 6	Southwestern	13	328-850	38.6	83-266	31.2	70.2
70.2 7	Grossmont	13	341-939	36.3	113-371	30.5	70.1

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	12	10.0	19.8	29.8	9.8
9.8 2	MiraCosta	12	8.5	18.2	26.7	21.6
21.6 3	Grossmont	13	18.5	22.2	40.7	-1.2
-1.2 4	Palomar	12	7.6	24.5	32.1	8.1
8.1 5	San Diego City	12	15.2	26.0	41.2	-1.2
-1.2 6	Imperial Valley	12	14.8	24.9	39.8	-10.8
-10.8 7	Southwestern	13	19.0	32.5	51.5	-24.2

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	San Diego Mesa	12	16.3	9.3	3.7	9.8
9.8 2	Grossmont	13	18.2	8.9	2.6	17.5
17.5 3	Imperial Valley	12	16.6	9.4	2.3	12.6
12.6 4	MiraCosta	12	22.7	12.5	3.9	7.5
7.5 5	Southwestern	13	24.9	12.2	2.5	13.6
13.6 6	Palomar	12	27.1	17.3	1.7	5.3
5.3 7	San Diego City	12	20.1	8.9	2.8	16.8

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Imperial Valley	12	12.0	-	-
- 2	MiraCosta	12	12.5	0.593	0.313
0.313 3	Palomar	12	12.3	-	-
- 4	Southwestern	13	16.3	0.854	-0.003
-0.003 5	San Diego Mesa	12	15.6	0.859	-0.078
-0.078 6	Grossmont	13	17.3	-	-
- 7	San Diego City	12	20.5	-	-