Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
12.0 1 Glendale 34 926 299 173 132 102 .323 .410 .428
18.0 2 LA Mission 40 1086 344 217 100 129 .317 .393 .458
6.0 3 Canyons 43 1100 325 195 111 173 .295 .369 .381
37.0 4 Antelope Valley 43 1102 325 207 124 198 .295 .383 .475
11.0 5 Citrus 41 1106 325 202 109 114 .294 .364 .409
4.0 6 Bakersfield 42 1127 317 187 123 144 .281 .357 .367
3.0 7 LA Valley 30 617 128 72 44 148 .207 .270 .277
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
37.0 1 Antelope Valley 43 65 11 37 113
18.0 2 LA Mission 40 79 10 18 107
12.0 3 Glendale 34 45 8 12 65
11.0 4 Citrus 41 78 8 11 97
6.0 5 Canyons 43 50 13 6 69
4.0 6 Bakersfield 42 47 19 4 70
3.0 7 LA Valley 30 26 4 3 33
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
18.0 1 LA Mission 40 241 497 23 8
11.0 2 Citrus 41 224 452 51 9
6.0 3 Canyons 43 220 419 115 18
37.0 4 Antelope Valley 43 212 523 14 4
4.0 5 Bakersfield 42 212 414 63 6
12.0 6 Glendale 34 201 396 35 5
3.0 7 LA Valley 30 85 171 36 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
37.0 1 Antelope Valley 43 40 11 33 10 235 354 .66 1310
4.0 2 Bakersfield 42 19 18 18 14 297 316 .94 1305
18.0 3 LA Mission 40 42 8 24 5 261 338 .77 1260
6.0 4 Canyons 43 20 4 22 9 277 286 .97 1257
11.0 5 Citrus 41 20 12 9 9 265 373 .71 1256
12.0 6 Glendale 34 11 9 22 7 211 276 .76 1100
3.0 7 LA Valley 30 10 3 6 0 176 138 1.28 680
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
3.0 1 LA Valley 30 30 147.2 296 306 217 10.29
6.0 2 Canyons 43 43 261.1 360 280 232 6.21
37.0 3 Antelope Valley 43 43 271.1 304 209 167 4.31
12.0 4 Glendale 34 34 219.2 286 183 130 4.14
18.0 5 LA Mission 40 40 258.2 250 152 124 3.36
11.0 6 Citrus 41 41 260.0 297 167 119 3.20
4.0 7 Bakersfield 42 42 276.2 306 149 118 2.99
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
3.0 1 LA Valley 30 30 63 2.99 17 3.07
6.0 2 Canyons 43 43 80 2.14 13 2.18
37.0 3 Antelope Valley 43 43 211 5.44 22 1.58
12.0 4 Glendale 34 34 138 4.40 9 1.54
11.0 5 Citrus 41 41 98 2.64 7 1.47
4.0 6 Bakersfield 42 42 209 5.29 9 1.42
18.0 7 LA Mission 40 40 186 5.03 11 1.33
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
18.0 1 LA Mission 40 1066 771 252 43 2 .960
6.0 2 Canyons 43 1094 783 259 52 23 .952
11.0 3 Citrus 41 1234 780 391 63 8 .949
4.0 4 Bakersfield 42 1198 820 316 62 17 .948
37.0 5 Antelope Valley 43 1078 814 206 58 19 .946
12.0 6 Glendale 34 955 659 231 65 13 .932
3.0 7 LA Valley 30 734 443 227 64 6 .913
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
11.0 1 Citrus 41 14 49 13 .210 1
4.0 2 Bakersfield 42 6 56 11 .164 2
6.0 3 Canyons 43 8 50 9 .153 0
3.0 4 LA Valley 30 3 43 7 .140 0
18.0 5 LA Mission 40 4 49 7 .125 0
12.0 6 Glendale 34 2 67 9 .118 0
37.0 7 Antelope Valley 43 4 42 3 .067 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
11.0 1 Citrus 20.0 1,564 79
3.0 2 LA Valley 15.0 750 50
6.0 3 Canyons 21.0 982 47
12.0 4 Glendale 18.0 191 11
18.0 5 LA Mission 11.0 110 10
37.0 6 Antelope Valley 21.0 0 0
4.0 7 Bakersfield 14.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
5.0 1 Glendale 12 311 97 60 48 31 .312 .406 .408
4.0 2 LA Mission 12 361 130 82 27 31 .360 .417 .482
3.0 3 Canyons 12 319 104 75 39 57 .326 .414 .436
7.0 4 Antelope Valley 12 304 78 55 40 73 .257 .367 .405
5.0 5 Citrus 12 323 93 62 27 43 .288 .350 .421
2.0 6 Bakersfield 12 324 93 69 38 28 .287 .364 .395
0.0 7 LA Valley 12 218 31 11 8 70 .142 .179 .170
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
7.0 1 Antelope Valley 12 20 2 7 29
4.0 2 LA Mission 12 24 4 4 32
5.0 3 Glendale 12 9 3 5 17
5.0 3 Citrus 12 24 2 5 31
3.0 5 Canyons 12 22 2 3 27
2.0 6 Bakersfield 12 19 5 2 26
0.0 7 LA Valley 12 2 2 0 4
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
4.0 1 LA Mission 12 84 174 8 2
5.0 2 Citrus 12 67 136 11 1
3.0 3 Canyons 12 79 139 37 8
7.0 4 Antelope Valley 12 56 123 5 1
2.0 5 Bakersfield 12 73 128 24 4
5.0 6 Glendale 12 66 127 8 2
0.0 7 LA Valley 12 13 37 6 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
7.0 1 Antelope Valley 12 15 3 11 0 53 104 .51 373
2.0 2 Bakersfield 12 4 5 5 2 87 103 .84 376
4.0 3 LA Mission 12 12 5 8 1 90 110 .82 413
3.0 4 Canyons 12 9 0 6 3 72 75 .96 373
5.0 5 Citrus 12 6 4 2 1 62 112 .55 362
5.0 5 Glendale 12 4 4 9 1 78 102 .76 376
0.0 7 LA Valley 12 2 1 2 0 56 53 1.06 231
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.0 1 LA Valley 12 12 57.0 125 135 103 12.65
3.0 2 Canyons 12 12 75.1 94 67 50 4.65
7.0 3 Antelope Valley 12 12 76.2 69 47 37 3.38
5.0 4 Glendale 12 12 78.0 96 56 40 3.59
4.0 5 LA Mission 12 12 83.1 71 39 32 2.69
5.0 6 Citrus 12 12 73.0 88 51 47 4.51
2.0 7 Bakersfield 12 12 79.0 83 42 36 3.19
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.0 1 LA Valley 12 12 14 1.72 7 3.53
3.0 2 Canyons 12 12 34 3.16 2 1.98
7.0 3 Antelope Valley 12 12 72 6.57 5 1.17
5.0 4 Glendale 12 12 44 3.95 4 1.36
5.0 4 Citrus 12 12 27 2.59 2 1.49
2.0 6 Bakersfield 12 12 67 5.94 0 1.32
4.0 7 LA Mission 12 12 75 6.30 6 1.13
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
4.0 1 LA Mission 12 334 250 69 15 1 .955
3.0 2 Canyons 12 309 226 66 17 5 .945
5.0 3 Citrus 12 342 219 114 9 2 .974
2.0 4 Bakersfield 12 337 237 85 15 3 .955
7.0 5 Antelope Valley 12 292 230 46 16 1 .945
5.0 6 Glendale 12 328 235 68 25 8 .924
0.0 7 LA Valley 12 277 171 85 21 2 .924
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
5.0 1 Citrus 12 3 8 2 .200 0
2.0 2 Bakersfield 12 2 15 6 .286 0
3.0 3 Canyons 12 2 7 1 .125 0
0.0 4 LA Valley 12 1 23 3 .115 0
4.0 5 LA Mission 12 - 15 3 .167 0
5.0 6 Glendale 12 - 22 1 .043 0
7.0 7 Antelope Valley 12 - 9 1 .100 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
5.0 1 Citrus 6.0 0 0
0.0 2 LA Valley 5.0 250 50
3.0 3 Canyons 6.0 296 50
5.0 4 Glendale 6.0 0 0
4.0 5 LA Mission 5.0 0 0
7.0 6 Antelope Valley 6.0 0 0
2.0 7 Bakersfield 6.0 0 0