California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
893.0 1	Sequoias	36	990	348	214	103	79	.352	.417	.448
949.0 2	Fresno City	38	1057	350	222	108	126	.331	.397	.469
882.0 3	Coalinga	33	838	248	127	98	140	.296	.378	.364
1037.0 4	Porterville	37	944	274	181	132	138	.290	.386	.395
932.0 5	Merced	34	925	266	153	78	132	.288	.353	.385
629.0 6	Reedley	28	733	195	99	64	115	.266	.335	.359
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
949.0 1	Fresno City	38	63	13	19	95
893.0 2	Sequoias	36	60	12	4	76
1037.0 3	Porterville	37	55	4	12	71
932.0 4	Merced	34	47	14	5	66
629.0 5	Reedley	28	37	8	5	50
882.0 6	Coalinga	33	42	3	3	48
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
893.0 1	Sequoias	36	251	444	59	10
949.0 2	Fresno City	38	247	496	62	9
1037.0 3	Porterville	37	217	373	29	6
932.0 4	Merced	34	170	356	57	6
882.0 5	Coalinga	33	151	305	52	5
629.0 6	Reedley	28	125	263	44	7
0 7	Taft	-	-	0	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
949.0 1	Fresno City	38	16	14	28	5	78	95	.82	1223
893.0 2	Sequoias	36	13	7	41	14	255	155	1.65	1154
1037.0 3	Porterville	37	19	7	25	4	83	85	.98	1127
932.0 4	Merced	34	21	9	7	4	129	202	.64	1040
882.0 5	Coalinga	33	16	6	16	1	38	49	.78	974
629.0 6	Reedley	28	13	2	18	1	95	109	.87	830
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
629.0 1	Reedley	28	28	167.1	243	202	162	6.78
882.0 2	Coalinga	33	33	204.2	286	229	139	4.75
932.0 3	Merced	34	34	218.0	248	156	136	4.37
1037.0 4	Porterville	37	37	223.0	334	219	138	4.33
893.0 5	Sequoias	36	36	224.1	248	151	111	3.46
949.0 6	Fresno City	38	38	241.1	293	158	113	3.28
0 7	Taft	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	0.00

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
629.0 1	Reedley	28	28	58	2.43	9	2.17
882.0 2	Coalinga	33	33	158	5.40	10	1.87
1037.0 3	Porterville	37	37	77	2.42	3	1.78
932.0 4	Merced	34	34	155	4.98	8	1.62
893.0 5	Sequoias	36	36	145	4.52	6	1.60
949.0 6	Fresno City	38	38	90	2.61	8	1.59
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	.00	-	0.00

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
1037.0 1	Porterville	37	1037	642	317	78	18	.925
949.0 2	Fresno City	38	949	684	214	51	5	.946
932.0 3	Merced	34	932	654	225	53	11	.943
893.0 4	Sequoias	36	893	659	186	48	5	.946
882.0 5	Coalinga	33	882	607	187	88	22	.900
629.0 6	Reedley	28	629	467	119	43	6	.932
0 7	Taft	-	0	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
949.0 1	Fresno City	38	10	29	5	.147	0
893.0 2	Sequoias	36	6	57	6	.095	0
932.0 3	Merced	34	4	53	4	.070	0
882.0 4	Coalinga	33	0	54	2	.036	0
629.0 5	Reedley	28	4	46	1	.021	0
1037.0 6	Porterville	37	5	65	0	.000	0
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
893.0 1	Sequoias	22.0	1,050	48
1037.0 2	Porterville	16.0	0	0
932.0 3	Merced	18.0	0	0
949.0 4	Fresno City	14.0	-	-
882.0 5	Coalinga	20.0	0	0
629.0 6	Reedley	14.0	0	0
0 7	Taft	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
343.0 1	Sequoias	14	397	135	70	39	33	.340	.403	.416
392.0 2	Fresno City	15	426	156	109	50	43	.366	.429	.540
368.0 3	Coalinga	14	349	92	36	40	59	.264	.348	.312
458.0 4	Porterville	15	387	106	56	60	61	.274	.379	.377
405.0 5	Merced	15	426	137	87	42	67	.322	.394	.437
364.0 6	Reedley	15	410	116	54	37	57	.283	.357	.371
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
392.0 1	Fresno City	15	30	7	10	47
343.0 2	Sequoias	14	24	0	2	26
458.0 3	Porterville	15	25	0	5	30
405.0 4	Merced	15	29	7	2	38
364.0 5	Reedley	15	20	5	2	27
368.0 6	Coalinga	14	12	1	1	14
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
343.0 1	Sequoias	14	100	165	28	3
392.0 2	Fresno City	15	123	230	34	3
458.0 3	Porterville	15	70	146	7	1
405.0 4	Merced	15	95	186	40	3
368.0 5	Coalinga	14	42	109	14	1
364.0 6	Reedley	15	63	152	20	6
0 7	Taft	-	-	0	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
392.0 1	Fresno City	15	6	12	8	0	25	43	.58	502
343.0 2	Sequoias	14	4	2	23	3	110	57	1.93	465
458.0 3	Porterville	15	7	3	13	1	31	29	1.07	470
405.0 4	Merced	15	12	5	2	0	32	76	.42	487
368.0 5	Coalinga	14	7	3	11	0	13	15	.87	410
364.0 6	Reedley	15	11	1	12	0	27	40	.68	471
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
364.0 1	Reedley	15	15	99.0	130	111	86	6.08
368.0 2	Coalinga	14	14	88.0	135	112	75	5.97
405.0 3	Merced	15	15	96.1	116	69	58	4.21
458.0 4	Porterville	15	15	93.0	161	106	70	5.27
343.0 5	Sequoias	14	14	90.1	92	52	40	3.10
392.0 6	Fresno City	15	15	95.0	106	47	37	2.73
0 7	Taft	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	0.00

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
364.0 1	Reedley	15	15	42	2.97	3	2.02
368.0 2	Coalinga	14	14	69	5.49	9	2.06
458.0 3	Porterville	15	15	33	2.48	1	2.03
405.0 4	Merced	15	15	67	4.87	3	1.69
343.0 5	Sequoias	14	14	78	6.04	1	1.55
392.0 6	Fresno City	15	15	42	3.09	0	1.46
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	.00	-	0.00

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
458.0 1	Porterville	15	458	284	139	35	9	.924
392.0 2	Fresno City	15	392	283	97	12	2	.969
405.0 3	Merced	15	405	289	93	23	3	.943
343.0 4	Sequoias	14	343	259	62	22	3	.936
368.0 5	Coalinga	14	368	264	65	39	7	.894
364.0 6	Reedley	15	364	285	52	27	2	.926
0 7	Taft	-	0	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
392.0 1	Fresno City	15	3	8	1	.111	0
343.0 2	Sequoias	14	1	28	4	.125	0
405.0 3	Merced	15	2	24	3	.111	0
368.0 4	Coalinga	14	0	20	0	.000	0
364.0 5	Reedley	15	1	27	1	.036	0
458.0 6	Porterville	15	0	35	0	.000	0
0 7	Taft	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
343.0 1	Sequoias	9.0	450	50
458.0 2	Porterville	6.0	0	0
405.0 3	Merced	7.0	0	0
392.0 4	Fresno City	6.0	-	-
368.0 5	Coalinga	6.0	0	0
364.0 6	Reedley	9.0	0	0
0 7	Taft	-	-	-