Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
41.0 1 Sequoias 36 990 348 214 103 79 .352 .417 .448
28.0 2 Fresno City 38 1057 350 222 108 126 .331 .397 .469
16.0 3 Coalinga 33 838 248 127 98 140 .296 .378 .364
25.0 4 Porterville 37 944 274 181 132 138 .290 .386 .395
7.0 5 Merced 34 925 266 153 78 132 .288 .353 .385
18.0 6 Reedley 28 733 195 99 64 115 .266 .335 .359
.359 7 Taft - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
28.0 1 Fresno City 38 63 13 19 95
41.0 2 Sequoias 36 60 12 4 76
25.0 3 Porterville 37 55 4 12 71
7.0 4 Merced 34 47 14 5 66
18.0 5 Reedley 28 37 8 5 50
16.0 6 Coalinga 33 42 3 3 48
48 7 Taft - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
41.0 1 Sequoias 36 251 444 59 10
28.0 2 Fresno City 38 247 496 62 9
25.0 3 Porterville 37 217 373 29 6
7.0 4 Merced 34 170 356 57 6
16.0 5 Coalinga 33 151 305 52 5
18.0 6 Reedley 28 125 263 44 7
7 7 Taft - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
41.0 1 Sequoias 36 13 7 41 14 255 155 1.65 1154
28.0 2 Fresno City 38 16 14 28 5 78 95 .82 1223
25.0 3 Porterville 37 19 7 25 4 83 85 .98 1127
18.0 4 Reedley 28 13 2 18 1 95 109 .87 830
16.0 5 Coalinga 33 16 6 16 1 38 49 .78 974
7.0 6 Merced 34 21 9 7 4 129 202 .64 1040
1040 7 Taft - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
18.0 1 Reedley 28 28 167.1 243 202 162 6.78
16.0 2 Coalinga 33 33 204.2 286 229 139 4.75
7.0 3 Merced 34 34 218.0 248 156 136 4.37
25.0 4 Porterville 37 37 223.0 334 219 138 4.33
41.0 5 Sequoias 36 36 224.1 248 151 111 3.46
28.0 6 Fresno City 38 38 241.1 293 158 113 3.28
3.28 7 Taft - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
18.0 1 Reedley 28 28 58 2.43 9 2.17
16.0 2 Coalinga 33 33 158 5.40 10 1.87
25.0 3 Porterville 37 37 77 2.42 3 1.78
7.0 4 Merced 34 34 155 4.98 8 1.62
41.0 5 Sequoias 36 36 145 4.52 6 1.60
28.0 6 Fresno City 38 38 90 2.61 8 1.59
1.59 7 Taft - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
28.0 1 Fresno City 38 949 684 214 51 5 .946
41.0 2 Sequoias 36 893 659 186 48 5 .946
7.0 3 Merced 34 932 654 225 53 11 .943
18.0 4 Reedley 28 629 467 119 43 6 .932
25.0 5 Porterville 37 1037 642 317 78 18 .925
16.0 6 Coalinga 33 882 607 187 88 22 .900
.900 7 Taft - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
28.0 1 Fresno City 38 10 29 5 .147 0
41.0 2 Sequoias 36 6 57 6 .095 0
7.0 3 Merced 34 4 53 4 .070 0
16.0 4 Coalinga 33 0 54 2 .036 0
18.0 5 Reedley 28 4 46 1 .021 0
25.0 6 Porterville 37 5 65 0 .000 0
0 7 Taft - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
41.0 1 Sequoias 22.0 1,050 48
28.0 2 Fresno City 14.0 - -
25.0 3 Porterville 16.0 0 0
18.0 4 Reedley 14.0 0 0
16.0 5 Coalinga 20.0 0 0
7.0 6 Merced 18.0 0 0
0 7 Taft - - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
23.0 1 Sequoias 14 397 135 70 39 33 .340 .403 .416
8.0 2 Fresno City 15 426 156 109 50 43 .366 .429 .540
11.0 3 Coalinga 14 349 92 36 40 59 .264 .348 .312
13.0 4 Porterville 15 387 106 56 60 61 .274 .379 .377
2.0 5 Merced 15 426 137 87 42 67 .322 .394 .437
12.0 6 Reedley 15 410 116 54 37 57 .283 .357 .371
.371 7 Taft - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
8.0 1 Fresno City 15 30 7 10 47
23.0 2 Sequoias 14 24 0 2 26
13.0 3 Porterville 15 25 0 5 30
2.0 4 Merced 15 29 7 2 38
12.0 5 Reedley 15 20 5 2 27
11.0 6 Coalinga 14 12 1 1 14
14 7 Taft - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
23.0 1 Sequoias 14 100 165 28 3
8.0 2 Fresno City 15 123 230 34 3
13.0 3 Porterville 15 70 146 7 1
2.0 4 Merced 15 95 186 40 3
11.0 5 Coalinga 14 42 109 14 1
12.0 6 Reedley 15 63 152 20 6
6 7 Taft - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
23.0 1 Sequoias 14 4 2 23 3 110 57 1.93 465
8.0 2 Fresno City 15 6 12 8 0 25 43 .58 502
13.0 3 Porterville 15 7 3 13 1 31 29 1.07 470
12.0 4 Reedley 15 11 1 12 0 27 40 .68 471
11.0 5 Coalinga 14 7 3 11 0 13 15 .87 410
2.0 6 Merced 15 12 5 2 0 32 76 .42 487
487 7 Taft - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.0 1 Reedley 15 15 99.0 130 111 86 6.08
11.0 2 Coalinga 14 14 88.0 135 112 75 5.97
2.0 3 Merced 15 15 96.1 116 69 58 4.21
13.0 4 Porterville 15 15 93.0 161 106 70 5.27
23.0 5 Sequoias 14 14 90.1 92 52 40 3.10
8.0 6 Fresno City 15 15 95.0 106 47 37 2.73
2.73 7 Taft - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
12.0 1 Reedley 15 15 42 2.97 3 2.02
11.0 2 Coalinga 14 14 69 5.49 9 2.06
13.0 3 Porterville 15 15 33 2.48 1 2.03
2.0 4 Merced 15 15 67 4.87 3 1.69
23.0 5 Sequoias 14 14 78 6.04 1 1.55
8.0 6 Fresno City 15 15 42 3.09 0 1.46
1.46 7 Taft - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
8.0 1 Fresno City 15 392 283 97 12 2 .969
23.0 2 Sequoias 14 343 259 62 22 3 .936
2.0 3 Merced 15 405 289 93 23 3 .943
12.0 4 Reedley 15 364 285 52 27 2 .926
13.0 5 Porterville 15 458 284 139 35 9 .924
11.0 6 Coalinga 14 368 264 65 39 7 .894
.894 7 Taft - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
8.0 1 Fresno City 15 3 8 1 .111 0
23.0 2 Sequoias 14 1 28 4 .125 0
2.0 3 Merced 15 2 24 3 .111 0
11.0 4 Coalinga 14 0 20 0 .000 0
12.0 5 Reedley 15 1 27 1 .036 0
13.0 6 Porterville 15 0 35 0 .000 0
0 7 Taft - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
23.0 1 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
8.0 2 Fresno City 6.0 - -
13.0 3 Porterville 6.0 0 0
12.0 4 Reedley 9.0 0 0
11.0 5 Coalinga 6.0 0 0
2.0 6 Merced 7.0 0 0
0 7 Taft - - -