California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Reedley	28	745-1739	42.8	168-609	27.6	281-441	63.7	69.3
69.3 2	Porterville	30	734-1485	49.4	162-460	35.2	409-617	66.3	70.0
70.0 3	Coalinga	28	691-1659	41.7	127-429	29.6	413-557	74.1	71.2
71.2 4	Columbia	30	744-1735	42.9	265-781	33.9	442-636	69.5	74.7
74.7 5	Lemoore	29	818-1742	47.0	291-728	40.0	372-506	73.5	79.3
79.3 6	Merced	28	548-1295	42.3	135-421	32.1	327-471	69.4	81.3
81.3 7	Sequoias	31	957-1997	47.9	241-667	36.1	426-606	70.3	83.3
83.3 8	Fresno City	28	857-1959	43.7	219-631	34.7	457-656	69.7	85.5

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Merced	28	7.1	13.2	20.3	-26.3
-26.3 2	Coalinga	28	10.0	23.1	33.1	-6.1
-6.1 3	Columbia	30	10.4	23.9	34.3	-0.2
-0.2 4	Lemoore	29	10.4	27.8	38.2	2.3
2.3 5	Reedley	28	11.1	23.3	34.4	-1.7
-1.7 6	Fresno City	28	13.2	27.0	40.3	7.8
7.8 7	Sequoias	31	13.5	31.2	44.6	11.0
11.0 8	Porterville	30	14.4	26.8	41.2	11.4

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Merced	28	9.3	8.1	4.3	6.4
6.4 2	Columbia	30	13.1	6.7	2.9	14.1
14.1 3	Coalinga	28	13.3	8.0	3.9	16.3
16.3 4	Fresno City	28	13.6	6.8	4.1	19.5
19.5 5	Sequoias	31	14.0	5.4	2.1	19.4
19.4 6	Lemoore	29	15.7	9.4	3.7	15.3
15.3 7	Reedley	28	17.2	9.6	3.3	11.9
11.9 8	Porterville	30	17.6	8.7	3.8	14.6

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Reedley	28	14.4	0.911	-0.154
-0.154 2	Coalinga	28	17.0	0.982	-0.162
-0.162 3	Fresno City	28	2.8	1.042	0.009
0.009 4	Columbia	30	1.4	1.051	0.102
0.102 5	Lemoore	29	15.6	1.070	-0.007
-0.007 6	Porterville	30	8.4	1.111	0.139
0.139 7	Sequoias	31	17.5	1.113	0.254
0.254 8	Merced	28	10.7	1.429	0.326

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Sequoias	31	684-1882	36.3	205-690	29.7	64.8
64.8 2	Porterville	30	615-1657	37.1	189-632	29.9	66.4
66.4 3	Columbia	30	772-1816	42.5	173-552	31.3	67.3
67.3 4	Fresno City	28	696-1587	43.9	198-579	34.2	74.5
74.5 5	Reedley	28	775-1695	45.7	169-528	32.0	76.0
76.0 6	Lemoore	29	810-1786	45.4	212-654	32.4	79.3
79.3 7	Coalinga	28	782-1698	46.1	235-665	35.3	81.9
81.9 8	Merced	28	927-1859	49.9	212-570	37.2	90.0

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Porterville	30	10.1	19.7	29.9	11.4
11.4 2	Fresno City	28	10.0	22.5	32.5	7.8
7.8 3	Sequoias	31	10.8	22.8	33.6	11.0
11.0 4	Columbia	30	10.4	24.0	34.5	-0.2
-0.2 5	Lemoore	29	11.9	24.1	36.0	2.3
2.3 6	Reedley	28	11.7	24.4	36.1	-1.7
-1.7 7	Coalinga	28	13.1	26.1	39.2	-6.1
-6.1 8	Merced	28	14.7	32.0	46.6	-26.3

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Porterville	30	13.2	7.8	6.3	11.3
11.3 2	Coalinga	28	13.6	7.0	3.0	19.0
19.0 3	Reedley	28	14.3	8.1	3.0	15.0
15.0 4	Columbia	30	14.6	8.3	3.4	13.8
13.8 5	Lemoore	29	14.7	8.0	1.8	16.5
16.5 6	Sequoias	31	15.5	10.0	6.2	11.0
11.0 7	Fresno City	28	16.3	10.2	3.7	13.7
13.7 8	Merced	28	18.0	6.5	0.9	19.9

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Reedley	28	9.1	1.064	-0.154
-0.154 2	Coalinga	28	9.8	1.145	-0.162
-0.162 3	Columbia	30	10.4	0.948	0.102
0.102 4	Lemoore	29	11.3	1.077	-0.007
-0.007 5	Fresno City	28	11.5	1.033	0.009
0.009 6	Merced	28	11.9	1.103	0.326
0.326 7	Porterville	30	13.0	0.972	0.139
0.139 8	Sequoias	31	14.0	0.859	0.254

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
$value 1	Reedley	14	371-893	41.5	93-350	26.6	136-206	66.0	69.4
69.4 2	Porterville	14	369-670	55.1	76-210	36.2	215-309	69.6	73.5
73.5 3	Coalinga	14	335-787	42.6	51-172	29.7	217-281	77.2	72.0
72.0 4	Columbia	14	340-814	41.8	133-397	33.5	214-310	69.0	73.4
73.4 5	Lemoore	14	375-808	46.4	128-323	39.6	180-254	70.9	75.6
75.6 6	Merced	14	256-597	42.9	59-186	31.7	134-195	68.7	82.6
82.6 7	Sequoias	14	460-925	49.7	121-326	37.1	209-291	71.8	89.3
89.3 8	Fresno City	14	420-1011	41.5	102-291	35.1	219-323	67.8	83.2

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Merced	14	7.3	12.1	19.4	-26.0
-26.0 2	Coalinga	14	11.6	20.6	32.1	-3.9
-3.9 3	Columbia	14	10.4	25.2	35.6	0.2
0.2 4	Lemoore	14	10.9	27.6	38.5	1.9
1.9 5	Reedley	14	10.8	21.9	32.6	-6.4
-6.4 6	Fresno City	14	14.0	23.9	37.9	5.3
5.3 7	Sequoias	14	14.1	33.0	47.1	12.3
12.3 8	Porterville	14	16.1	26.1	42.3	16.6

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Merced	14	9.4	7.9	4.7	6.1
6.1 2	Columbia	14	13.6	6.6	2.8	14.8
14.8 3	Coalinga	14	15.6	9.5	3.8	15.4
15.4 4	Fresno City	14	12.9	8.0	4.5	17.6
17.6 5	Sequoias	14	14.2	6.1	1.7	21.6
21.6 6	Lemoore	14	15.3	9.4	4.6	13.3
13.3 7	Reedley	14	18.1	9.6	3.9	13.6
13.6 8	Porterville	14	14.1	7.1	2.9	16.9

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
$value 1	Reedley	14	15.2	0.884	-0.293
-0.293 2	Coalinga	14	18.3	1.024	-0.253
-0.253 3	Fresno City	14	4.6	1.007	-0.122
-0.122 4	Columbia	14	1.9	1.012	0.045
0.045 5	Lemoore	14	14.6	1.061	-0.114
-0.114 6	Porterville	14	2.5	1.294	0.173
0.173 7	Sequoias	14	18.7	1.166	0.324
0.324 8	Merced	14	10.9	1.596	0.414

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
$value 1	Sequoias	14	311-892	34.9	86-308	27.9	64.6
64.6 2	Porterville	14	273-685	39.9	91-274	33.2	68.4
68.4 3	Columbia	14	376-876	42.9	85-265	32.1	69.2
69.2 4	Fresno City	14	350-762	45.9	103-288	35.8	79.0
79.0 5	Reedley	14	398-844	47.2	86-268	32.1	81.5
81.5 6	Lemoore	14	375-827	45.3	92-285	32.3	80.3
80.3 7	Coalinga	14	388-776	50.0	120-319	37.6	87.4
87.4 8	Merced	14	455-843	54.0	100-248	40.3	88.5

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
$value 1	Porterville	14	8.2	17.4	25.6	16.6
16.6 2	Fresno City	14	10.6	22.1	32.6	5.3
5.3 3	Sequoias	14	12.2	22.6	34.8	12.3
12.3 4	Columbia	14	10.9	24.5	35.4	0.2
0.2 5	Lemoore	14	13.2	23.4	36.6	1.9
1.9 6	Reedley	14	13.6	25.4	39.1	-6.4
-6.4 7	Coalinga	14	12.1	24.0	36.1	-3.9
-3.9 8	Merced	14	14.3	31.1	45.4	-26.0

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
$value 1	Porterville	14	12.1	8.6	6.1	11.4
11.4 2	Coalinga	14	13.5	7.4	3.1	18.0
18.0 3	Reedley	14	13.9	7.9	2.6	15.5
15.5 4	Columbia	14	12.7	6.8	3.5	13.9
13.9 5	Lemoore	14	13.4	6.9	1.9	15.6
15.6 6	Sequoias	14	15.1	10.1	7.5	9.9
9.9 7	Fresno City	14	14.9	10.0	3.3	14.6
14.6 8	Merced	14	17.6	6.5	0.8	20.1

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
$value 1	Reedley	14	6.6	1.177	-0.293
-0.293 2	Coalinga	14	9.1	1.277	-0.253
-0.253 3	Columbia	14	12.6	0.967	0.045
0.045 4	Lemoore	14	8.1	1.175	-0.114
-0.114 5	Fresno City	14	11.7	1.129	-0.122
-0.122 6	Merced	14	10.6	1.181	0.414
0.414 7	Porterville	14	11.2	1.120	0.173
0.173 8	Sequoias	14	16.7	0.842	0.324