Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
13.053571428571429 1 Fresno City 35 112 1586 14.16 449 2995 .380 1462 13.05 2133.5 19.0
9.236842105263158 2 Taft 21 76 795 10.46 351 2311 .192 702 9.24 1051.0 13.8
9.23 3 Sequoias 30 100 1034 10.34 333 2856 .245 923 9.23 1455.5 14.6
8.574712643678161 4 Coalinga 24 87 820 9.43 463 2056 .174 746 8.57 996.0 11.4
7.228571428571429 5 Merced 19 70 585 8.36 337 2107 .118 506 7.23 784.0 11.2
6.714285714285714 6 Porterville 24 91 690 7.58 420 2106 .128 611 6.71 921.5 10.1
6.329411764705882 7 Lemoore 23 85 622 7.32 440 2112 .086 538 6.33 943.0 11.1
2.869565217391304 8 Reedley 18 69 215 3.12 98 590 .198 198 2.87 323.0 4.7
2.6451612903225805 9 Columbia 20 62 165 2.66 179 864 -.016 164 2.65 267.0 4.3
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
9.236842105263158 1 Taft 21 76 1455 19.14 28 86 71 0.93
9.23 2 Sequoias 30 100 1413 14.13 178 51 204 2.04
13.053571428571429 3 Fresno City 35 112 1383 12.35 58 225 171 1.52
6.329411764705882 4 Lemoore 23 85 934 10.99 38 72 74 0.87
6.714285714285714 5 Porterville 24 91 867 9.53 42 121 103 1.13
7.228571428571429 6 Merced 19 70 780 11.14 22 66 55 0.79
8.574712643678161 7 Coalinga 24 87 765 8.79 5 10 10 0.11
2.6451612903225805 8 Columbia 20 62 486 7.84 35 16 43 0.69
2.869565217391304 9 Reedley 18 69 258 3.74 40 46 63 0.91
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
13.053571428571429 1 Fresno City 35 112 377 3.37 1512 89
6.329411764705882 2 Lemoore 23 85 247 2.91 1495 200
9.236842105263158 3 Taft 21 76 185 2.43 371 31
9.23 4 Sequoias 30 100 218 2.18 1495 157
7.228571428571429 5 Merced 19 70 144 2.06 1191 101
8.574712643678161 6 Coalinga 24 87 166 1.91 0 0
6.714285714285714 7 Porterville 24 91 129 1.42 145 14
2.6451612903225805 8 Columbia 20 62 59 0.95 947 135
2.869565217391304 9 Reedley 18 69 45 0.65 439 115
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
12.645833333333334 1 Fresno City 16 48 678 14.13 146 1149 .463 607 12.65 968.5 20.2
9.648148148148149 2 Taft 16 54 585 10.83 247 1653 .204 521 9.65 783.0 14.5
9.666666666666666 3 Sequoias 16 48 531 11.06 149 1237 .309 464 9.67 748.5 15.6
8.696428571428571 4 Coalinga 16 56 540 9.64 294 1410 .174 487 8.70 647.0 11.6
7.280701754385965 5 Merced 15 57 471 8.26 264 1699 .122 415 7.28 624.0 10.9
7.456140350877193 6 Porterville 16 57 473 8.30 282 1507 .127 425 7.46 610.0 10.7
5.931034482758621 7 Lemoore 15 58 413 7.12 252 1351 .119 344 5.93 601.5 10.4
2.192982456140351 8 Reedley 15 57 127 2.23 59 312 .218 125 2.19 182.5 3.2
2.1707317073170733 9 Columbia 13 41 90 2.20 124 545 -.062 89 2.17 151.0 3.7
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
9.648148148148149 1 Taft 16 54 1093 20.24 20 68 54 1.00
9.666666666666666 2 Sequoias 16 48 674 14.04 91 29 106 2.20
12.645833333333334 3 Fresno City 16 48 588 12.25 17 95 65 1.34
5.931034482758621 4 Lemoore 15 58 591 10.19 20 37 39 0.66
7.456140350877193 5 Porterville 16 57 692 12.14 22 84 64 1.12
7.280701754385965 6 Merced 15 57 644 11.30 17 60 47 0.82
8.696428571428571 7 Coalinga 16 56 524 9.36 2 0 2 0.04
2.1707317073170733 8 Columbia 13 41 332 8.10 25 8 29 0.71
2.192982456140351 9 Reedley 15 57 195 3.42 26 27 40 0.69
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
12.645833333333334 1 Fresno City 16 48 226 4.71 469 15
5.931034482758621 2 Lemoore 15 58 150 2.59 985 131
9.648148148148149 3 Taft 16 54 144 2.67 0 0
9.666666666666666 4 Sequoias 16 48 112 2.33 632 55
7.280701754385965 5 Merced 15 57 106 1.86 951 81
8.696428571428571 6 Coalinga 16 56 105 1.88 0 0
7.456140350877193 7 Porterville 16 57 73 1.28 57 7
2.1707317073170733 8 Columbia 13 41 32 0.78 654 104
2.192982456140351 9 Reedley 15 57 16 0.28 280 81