California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
1.1372549019607843 1	Fresno City	30	102	1290	12.65	500	3625	.218	1227	12.03	1709.0	16.8
2.1627906976744184 2	Sequoias	23	86	920	10.70	422	2741	.182	774	9.00	1272.0	14.8
1.3604651162790697 3	Merced	23	86	863	10.03	507	2723	.131	742	8.63	1155.0	13.4
1.4656862745098038 4	Taft	28	102	1012	9.92	400	3453	.177	886	8.69	1319.5	12.9
0.8571428571428571 5	Reedley	24	91	880	9.67	550	3444	.096	815	8.96	1162.0	12.8
1.2258064516129032 6	Coalinga	25	93	822	8.84	561	2998	.087	816	8.77	1137.0	12.2
0.8009708737864077 7	Cerro Coso	27	103	934	9.07	478	3155	.145	848	8.23	1247.5	12.1
1.3370786516853932 8	Columbia	24	89	657	7.38	55	383	1.572	573	6.44	873.0	9.8
1.3924050632911393 9	Porterville	22	79	551	6.97	371	1930	.093	485	6.14	769.0	9.7

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
2.1627906976744184 1	Sequoias	23	86	1348	15.67	154	64	186	2.16
1.4656862745098038 2	Taft	28	102	1958	19.20	101	97	150	1.47
1.3924050632911393 3	Porterville	22	79	1062	13.44	110	0	110	1.39
1.3604651162790697 4	Merced	23	86	921	10.71	47	140	117	1.36
1.3370786516853932 5	Columbia	24	89	1265	14.21	119	0	119	1.34
1.2258064516129032 6	Coalinga	25	93	1550	16.67	62	104	114	1.23
1.1372549019607843 7	Fresno City	30	102	1938	19.00	43	146	116	1.14
0.8571428571428571 8	Reedley	24	91	806	8.86	64	28	78	0.86
0.8009708737864077 9	Cerro Coso	27	103	1484	14.41	76	13	83	0.80

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
1.1372549019607843 1	Fresno City	30	102	303	2.97	1513	105
0.8009708737864077 2	Cerro Coso	27	103	231	2.24	1561	234
0.8571428571428571 3	Reedley	24	91	204	2.24	1768	256
1.2258064516129032 4	Coalinga	25	93	201	2.16	1	121
1.3604651162790697 5	Merced	23	86	175	2.03	0	0
2.1627906976744184 6	Sequoias	23	86	166	1.93	1552	202
1.4656862745098038 7	Taft	28	102	158	1.55	1799	220
1.3924050632911393 8	Porterville	22	79	108	1.37	0	0
1.3370786516853932 9	Columbia	24	89	97	1.09	1147	46

Rk	Team	m	s	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	a	a/s	pts	pts/s
1.22 1	Fresno City	16	50	661	13.22	218	1664	.266	622	12.44	904.0	18.1
1.9098360655737705 2	Sequoias	16	61	697	11.43	300	2016	.197	580	9.51	927.5	15.2
1.5081967213114753 3	Merced	16	61	630	10.33	351	2054	.136	541	8.87	846.0	13.9
1.646551724137931 4	Taft	16	58	599	10.33	241	1945	.184	537	9.26	780.5	13.5
0.9516129032258065 5	Reedley	16	62	616	9.94	373	2341	.104	571	9.21	794.0	12.8
1.3448275862068966 6	Coalinga	16	58	488	8.41	361	1864	.068	483	8.33	686.0	11.8
0.7578125 7	Cerro Coso	16	64	630	9.84	318	2182	.143	576	9.00	822.5	12.9
1.3064516129032258 8	Columbia	16	62	433	6.98	14	119	3.521	370	5.97	552.0	8.9
1.4666666666666666 9	Porterville	16	60	418	6.97	291	1487	.085	369	6.15	583.0	9.7

Rk	Team	m	s	digs	d/s	bs	ba	tot	b/s
1.9098360655737705 1	Sequoias	16	61	950	15.57	99	35	117	1.91
1.646551724137931 2	Taft	16	58	1154	19.90	64	63	96	1.65
1.4666666666666666 3	Porterville	16	60	866	14.43	88	0	88	1.47
1.5081967213114753 4	Merced	16	61	668	10.95	39	106	92	1.51
1.3064516129032258 5	Columbia	16	62	754	12.16	81	0	81	1.31
1.3448275862068966 6	Coalinga	16	58	962	16.59	44	68	78	1.34
1.22 7	Fresno City	16	50	1001	20.02	23	76	61	1.22
0.9516129032258065 8	Reedley	16	62	517	8.34	49	20	59	0.95
0.7578125 9	Cerro Coso	16	64	953	14.89	47	3	49	0.76

Rk	Team	m	s	sa	sa/s	r	re
1.22 1	Fresno City	16	50	182	3.64	641	44
0.7578125 2	Cerro Coso	16	64	144	2.25	1032	137
0.9516129032258065 3	Reedley	16	62	119	1.92	1286	161
1.3448275862068966 4	Coalinga	16	58	120	2.07	1	81
1.5081967213114753 5	Merced	16	61	124	2.03	0	0
1.9098360655737705 6	Sequoias	16	61	114	1.87	1079	125
1.646551724137931 7	Taft	16	58	86	1.48	975	117
1.4666666666666666 8	Porterville	16	60	77	1.28	0	0
1.3064516129032258 9	Columbia	16	62	38	0.61	607	18