California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
661.9999999999999 1	San Joaquin Delta	47	1279	456	281	134	144	.357	.436	.518
609.0 2	Cosumnes River	43	1225	431	284	131	93	.352	.427	.497
638.0 3	Sierra	45	1287	447	268	110	99	.347	.404	.496
467.0 4	Sacramento City	38	1024	344	167	65	80	.336	.380	.456
445.0 5	Diablo Valley	40	1073	350	200	117	103	.326	.400	.415
326.0 6	American River	35	914	258	110	107	106	.282	.364	.357
270.0 7	Modesto	35	841	218	86	50	91	.259	.318	.321
278.0 8	Santa Rosa	36	846	218	105	78	121	.258	.335	.329
261.0 9	Folsom Lake	36	870	210	76	58	105	.241	.305	.300

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
661.9999999999999 1	San Joaquin Delta	47	88	17	28	133
638.0 2	Sierra	45	73	11	32	116
609.0 3	Cosumnes River	43	70	12	28	110
467.0 4	Sacramento City	38	48	6	21	75
445.0 5	Diablo Valley	40	53	9	8	70
278.0 6	Santa Rosa	36	35	2	7	44
326.0 7	American River	35	27	7	9	43
261.0 8	Folsom Lake	36	27	6	4	37
270.0 9	Modesto	35	25	6	5	36

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
661.9999999999999 1	San Joaquin Delta	47	326	662	48	14
638.0 2	Sierra	45	311	638	67	10
609.0 3	Cosumnes River	43	321	609	28	14
467.0 4	Sacramento City	38	214	467	50	6
445.0 5	Diablo Valley	40	258	445	49	4
326.0 6	American River	35	159	326	35	4
278.0 7	Santa Rosa	36	130	278	36	8
270.0 8	Modesto	35	102	270	7	3
261.0 9	Folsom Lake	36	102	261	11	2

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
661.9999999999999 1	San Joaquin Delta	47	55	13	36	4	80	58	1.38	1517
638.0 2	Sierra	45	17	7	50	2	59	46	1.28	1471
609.0 3	Cosumnes River	43	35	8	47	2	73	43	1.70	1446
445.0 4	Diablo Valley	40	22	11	28	4	35	33	1.06	1251
467.0 5	Sacramento City	38	15	12	28	7	215	163	1.32	1144
326.0 6	American River	35	13	4	16	3	65	32	2.03	1054
261.0 7	Folsom Lake	36	23	3	31	6	68	48	1.42	985
278.0 8	Santa Rosa	36	23	5	19	4	138	133	1.04	971
270.0 9	Modesto	35	22	0	12	9	89	59	1.51	925

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
261.0 1	Folsom Lake	36	36	187.2	358	257	202	7.53
270.0 2	Modesto	35	35	200.0	325	232	177	6.20
278.0 3	Santa Rosa	36	36	216.2	276	236	178	5.75
445.0 4	Diablo Valley	40	40	252.2	324	187	144	3.99
326.0 5	American River	35	35	220.0	275	167	116	3.69
638.0 6	Sierra	45	45	294.0	319	187	144	3.43
609.0 7	Cosumnes River	43	43	283.0	325	151	120	2.97
467.0 8	Sacramento City	38	38	238.0	242	134	87	2.56
661.9999999999999 9	San Joaquin Delta	47	47	309.1	314	141	103	2.33

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
326.0 1	American River	35	35	59	1.88	6	1.58
638.0 2	Sierra	45	45	125	2.98	26	1.45
609.0 3	Cosumnes River	43	43	128	3.17	9	1.38
661.9999999999999 4	San Joaquin Delta	47	47	131	2.96	14	1.25
467.0 5	Sacramento City	38	38	127	3.74	18	-
445.0 6	Diablo Valley	40	40	121	3.35	12	-
278.0 7	Santa Rosa	36	36	108	3.49	19	-
270.0 8	Modesto	35	35	52	1.82	11	-
261.0 9	Folsom Lake	36	36	28	1.04	21	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
445.0 1	Diablo Valley	40	978	669	274	35	10	.964
638.0 2	Sierra	45	1334	858	424	52	9	.961
609.0 3	Cosumnes River	43	1249	816	384	49	7	.961
661.9999999999999 4	San Joaquin Delta	47	1483	925	494	64	5	.957
326.0 5	American River	35	1057	666	342	49	12	.954
467.0 6	Sacramento City	38	1058	716	281	61	5	.942
278.0 7	Santa Rosa	36	959	605	296	58	17	.940
270.0 8	Modesto	35	962	597	280	85	7	.912
261.0 9	Folsom Lake	36	911	588	235	88	21	.903

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
609.0 1	Cosumnes River	43	17	14	4	.222	0
638.0 2	Sierra	45	8	17	3	.150	0
661.9999999999999 3	San Joaquin Delta	47	9	25	4	.138	0
270.0 4	Modesto	35	7	54	2	.036	0
261.0 5	Folsom Lake	36	5	75	2	.026	0
467.0 6	Sacramento City	38	8	20	0	.000	0
445.0 7	Diablo Valley	40	8	33	0	.000	0
326.0 8	American River	35	5	40	0	.000	0
278.0 9	Santa Rosa	36	3	56	0	.000	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
467.0 1	Sacramento City	18.0	2,170	121
445.0 2	Diablo Valley	20.0	878	44
638.0 3	Sierra	24.0	492	21
609.0 4	Cosumnes River	17.0	-	-
661.9999999999999 5	San Joaquin Delta	23.0	0	0
326.0 6	American River	19.0	0	0
278.0 7	Santa Rosa	17.0	0	0
270.0 8	Modesto	13.0	0	0
261.0 9	Folsom Lake	18.0	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
362.00000000000006 1	San Joaquin Delta	24	656	246	158	70	64	.375	.458	.552
367.99999999999994 2	Cosumnes River	24	688	254	177	68	40	.369	.438	.535
345.0 3	Sierra	24	704	248	140	50	48	.352	.399	.490
321.0 4	Sacramento City	24	671	238	119	36	48	.355	.389	.478
231.0 5	Diablo Valley	24	635	187	104	64	61	.294	.365	.364
199.0 6	American River	24	620	162	55	69	75	.261	.342	.321
177.0 7	Modesto	23	550	142	61	33	50	.258	.314	.322
193.0 8	Santa Rosa	23	541	149	66	43	63	.275	.342	.357
172.0 9	Folsom Lake	24	588	141	49	35	71	.240	.295	.293

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
362.00000000000006 1	San Joaquin Delta	24	49	8	17	74
345.0 2	Sierra	24	42	8	13	63
367.99999999999994 3	Cosumnes River	24	40	10	18	68
321.0 4	Sacramento City	24	30	4	15	49
231.0 5	Diablo Valley	24	23	3	5	31
193.0 6	Santa Rosa	23	21	1	7	29
199.0 7	American River	24	15	2	6	23
172.0 8	Folsom Lake	24	18	2	3	23
177.0 9	Modesto	23	21	4	2	27

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
362.00000000000006 1	San Joaquin Delta	24	181	362	22	8
345.0 2	Sierra	24	167	345	37	5
367.99999999999994 3	Cosumnes River	24	189	368	16	7
321.0 4	Sacramento City	24	148	321	38	1
231.0 5	Diablo Valley	24	128	231	21	1
199.0 6	American River	24	76	199	21	2
193.0 7	Santa Rosa	23	83	193	19	5
177.0 8	Modesto	23	67	177	4	1
172.0 9	Folsom Lake	24	63	172	10	1

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
362.00000000000006 1	San Joaquin Delta	24	35	6	23	3	26	27	.96	790
345.0 2	Sierra	24	8	5	27	1	40	27	1.48	794
367.99999999999994 3	Cosumnes River	24	18	2	18	1	33	21	1.57	794
231.0 4	Diablo Valley	24	10	7	18	3	12	4	3.00	734
321.0 5	Sacramento City	24	8	10	18	3	107	73	1.47	743
199.0 6	American River	24	8	2	9	2	31	7	4.43	708
172.0 7	Folsom Lake	24	12	3	18	5	21	14	1.50	656
193.0 8	Santa Rosa	23	14	4	14	2	75	64	1.17	616
177.0 9	Modesto	23	12	0	11	6	40	17	2.35	606

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
172.0 1	Folsom Lake	24	24	128.2	261	193	158	8.60
177.0 2	Modesto	23	23	133.2	225	160	130	6.81
193.0 3	Santa Rosa	23	23	138.0	167	148	115	5.83
231.0 4	Diablo Valley	24	24	151.2	208	118	91	4.20
199.0 5	American River	24	24	157.0	202	123	82	3.66
345.0 6	Sierra	24	24	153.0	160	89	72	3.29
367.99999999999994 7	Cosumnes River	24	24	153.0	175	84	69	3.16
321.0 8	Sacramento City	24	24	149.0	166	100	63	2.96
362.00000000000006 9	San Joaquin Delta	24	24	157.0	159	64	52	2.32

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
199.0 1	American River	24	24	36	1.61	5	1.57
345.0 2	Sierra	24	24	63	2.88	9	1.44
367.99999999999994 3	Cosumnes River	24	24	86	3.93	4	1.32
362.00000000000006 4	San Joaquin Delta	24	24	59	2.63	6	1.25
321.0 5	Sacramento City	24	24	81	3.81	14	-
231.0 6	Diablo Valley	24	24	71	3.28	6	-
193.0 7	Santa Rosa	23	23	72	3.65	11	-
177.0 8	Modesto	23	23	32	1.68	9	-
172.0 9	Folsom Lake	24	24	24	1.31	18	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
231.0 1	Diablo Valley	24	586	404	161	21	6	.964
345.0 2	Sierra	24	702	458	216	28	8	.960
367.99999999999994 3	Cosumnes River	24	679	458	194	27	5	.960
362.00000000000006 4	San Joaquin Delta	24	729	468	234	27	2	.963
199.0 5	American River	24	720	454	232	34	9	.953
321.0 6	Sacramento City	24	661	448	170	43	5	.935
193.0 7	Santa Rosa	23	606	390	181	35	8	.942
177.0 8	Modesto	23	639	402	186	51	6	.920
172.0 9	Folsom Lake	24	620	410	154	56	16	.910

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
367.99999999999994 1	Cosumnes River	24	11	6	2	.250	0
345.0 2	Sierra	24	4	11	2	.154	0
362.00000000000006 3	San Joaquin Delta	24	4	7	1	.125	0
177.0 4	Modesto	23	4	26	2	.071	0
172.0 5	Folsom Lake	24	4	50	0	.000	0
321.0 6	Sacramento City	24	4	8	0	.000	0
231.0 7	Diablo Valley	24	5	17	0	.000	0
199.0 8	American River	24	4	30	0	.000	0
193.0 9	Santa Rosa	23	3	33	0	.000	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
321.0 1	Sacramento City	12.0	1,620	135
231.0 2	Diablo Valley	12.0	552	46
345.0 3	Sierra	12.0	362	31
367.99999999999994 4	Cosumnes River	12.0	-	-
362.00000000000006 5	San Joaquin Delta	12.0	0	0
199.0 6	American River	13.0	0	0
193.0 7	Santa Rosa	10.0	0	0
177.0 8	Modesto	11.0	0	0
172.0 9	Folsom Lake	12.0	0	0