California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	sh	g	gfa	a	pts	sh%	shpg
0.6292134831460674 1	Mt. San Antonio	22	89	56	2.55	46	158	.629	4.0
0.45121951219512196 2	Chaffey	21	82	37	1.76	21	95	.451	3.9
0.37362637362637363 3	Rio Hondo	22	91	34	1.55	25	93	.374	4.1
0.25862068965517243 4	East Los Angeles	21	116	30	1.43	22	82	.259	5.5
0.17857142857142858 5	Pasadena City	20	168	30	1.50	27	87	.179	8.4

Rk	Team	gp	ga	gaa	sv	so
0.17857142857142858 1	Pasadena City	20	49	2.45	112	2
0.25862068965517243 2	East Los Angeles	21	48	2.67	76	2
0.45121951219512196 3	Chaffey	21	38	1.81	103	5
0.37362637362637363 4	Rio Hondo	22	29	1.71	63	6
0.6292134831460674 5	Mt. San Antonio	22	16	0.73	69	10

Rk	Team	gp	yc	rc	ck
0.17857142857142858 1	Pasadena City	20	41	1	47
0.25862068965517243 2	East Los Angeles	21	11	1	31
0.45121951219512196 3	Chaffey	21	18	2	29
0.6292134831460674 4	Mt. San Antonio	22	17	2	21
0.37362637362637363 5	Rio Hondo	22	9	2	8

Rk	Team	gp	sh	g	gfa	a	pts	sh%	shpg
0.78125 1	Mt. San Antonio	8	32	25	3.13	19	69	.781	4.0
0.7647058823529411 2	Chaffey	8	17	13	1.63	11	37	.765	2.1
0.5 3	Rio Hondo	8	30	15	1.88	12	42	.500	3.8
0.16071428571428573 4	East Los Angeles	8	56	9	1.13	6	24	.161	7.0
0.1917808219178082 5	Pasadena City	8	73	14	1.75	15	43	.192	9.1

Rk	Team	gp	ga	gaa	sv	so
0.1917808219178082 1	Pasadena City	8	20	2.50	43	0
0.16071428571428573 2	East Los Angeles	8	20	2.86	31	1
0.7647058823529411 3	Chaffey	8	17	2.13	50	2
0.5 4	Rio Hondo	8	12	1.71	28	1
0.78125 5	Mt. San Antonio	8	7	0.88	28	3

Rk	Team	gp	yc	rc	ck
0.1917808219178082 1	Pasadena City	8	12	0	25
0.16071428571428573 2	East Los Angeles	8	2	1	1
0.7647058823529411 3	Chaffey	8	8	0	5
0.78125 4	Mt. San Antonio	8	8	1	8
0.5 5	Rio Hondo	8	1	2	2