Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3515151515151515 1 Sequoias 36 990 348 214 103 79 .352 .417 .448
0.33112582781456956 2 Fresno City 38 1057 350 222 108 126 .331 .397 .469
0.29594272076372313 3 Coalinga 33 838 248 127 98 140 .296 .378 .364
0.2902542372881356 4 Porterville 37 944 274 181 132 138 .290 .386 .395
0.2875675675675676 5 Merced 34 925 266 153 78 132 .288 .353 .385
0.2660300136425648 6 Reedley 28 733 195 99 64 115 .266 .335 .359
.359 7 Taft - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
95.0 1 Fresno City 38 63 13 19 95
76.0 2 Sequoias 36 60 12 4 76
71.0 3 Porterville 37 55 4 12 71
66.0 4 Merced 34 47 14 5 66
50.0 5 Reedley 28 37 8 5 50
48.0 6 Coalinga 33 42 3 3 48
0 7 Taft - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
251.0 1 Sequoias 36 251 444 59 10
247.0 2 Fresno City 38 247 496 62 9
217.0 3 Porterville 37 217 373 29 6
170.0 4 Merced 34 170 356 57 6
151.0 5 Coalinga 33 151 305 52 5
125.0 6 Reedley 28 125 263 44 7
7 7 Taft - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1223.0 1 Fresno City 38 16 14 28 5 78 95 .82 1223
1154.0 2 Sequoias 36 13 7 41 14 255 155 1.65 1154
1127.0 3 Porterville 37 19 7 25 4 83 85 .98 1127
1040.0 4 Merced 34 21 9 7 4 129 202 .64 1040
974.0 5 Coalinga 33 16 6 16 1 38 49 .78 974
830.0 6 Reedley 28 13 2 18 1 95 109 .87 830
0 7 Taft - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.776892430278884 1 Reedley 28 28 167.1 243 202 162 6.78
4.754071661237786 2 Coalinga 33 33 204.2 286 229 139 4.75
4.366972477064221 3 Merced 34 34 218.0 248 156 136 4.37
4.331838565022421 4 Porterville 37 37 223.0 334 219 138 4.33
3.4635958395245168 5 Sequoias 36 36 224.1 248 151 111 3.46
3.277624309392265 6 Fresno City 38 38 241.1 293 158 113 3.28
0.0 7 Taft - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.1693227091633465 1 Reedley 28 28 58 2.43 9 2.17
1.8713355048859937 2 Coalinga 33 33 158 5.40 10 1.87
1.7757847533632287 3 Porterville 37 37 77 2.42 3 1.78
1.6192660550458715 4 Merced 34 34 155 4.98 8 1.62
1.5958395245170875 5 Sequoias 36 36 145 4.52 6 1.60
1.5870165745856353 6 Fresno City 38 38 90 2.61 8 1.59
0.0 7 Taft - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.946259220231823 1 Fresno City 38 949 684 214 51 5 .946
0.9462486002239642 2 Sequoias 36 893 659 186 48 5 .946
0.9431330472103004 3 Merced 34 932 654 225 53 11 .943
0.931637519872814 4 Reedley 28 629 467 119 43 6 .932
0.9247830279652844 5 Porterville 37 1037 642 317 78 18 .925
0.9002267573696145 6 Coalinga 33 882 607 187 88 22 .900
.900 7 Taft - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.14705882352941177 1 Fresno City 38 10 29 5 .147 0
0.09523809523809523 2 Sequoias 36 6 57 6 .095 0
0.07017543859649122 3 Merced 34 4 53 4 .070 0
0.03571428571428571 4 Coalinga 33 0 54 2 .036 0
0.02127659574468085 5 Reedley 28 4 46 1 .021 0
0.0 6 Porterville 37 5 65 0 .000 0
0 7 Taft - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
48.0 1 Sequoias 22.0 1,050 48
0.0 2 Coalinga 20.0 0 0
0 3 Fresno City 14.0 - -
0.0 4 Merced 18.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 16.0 0 0
0.0 4 Reedley 14.0 0 0
0 7 Taft - - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.34005037783375314 1 Sequoias 14 397 135 70 39 33 .340 .403 .416
0.36619718309859156 2 Fresno City 15 426 156 109 50 43 .366 .429 .540
0.2636103151862464 3 Coalinga 14 349 92 36 40 59 .264 .348 .312
0.2739018087855297 4 Porterville 15 387 106 56 60 61 .274 .379 .377
0.3215962441314554 5 Merced 15 426 137 87 42 67 .322 .394 .437
0.28292682926829266 6 Reedley 15 410 116 54 37 57 .283 .357 .371
.371 7 Taft - - - - - - - - -
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
47.0 1 Fresno City 15 30 7 10 47
26.0 2 Sequoias 14 24 0 2 26
30.0 3 Porterville 15 25 0 5 30
38.0 4 Merced 15 29 7 2 38
27.0 5 Reedley 15 20 5 2 27
14.0 6 Coalinga 14 12 1 1 14
0 7 Taft - - - - 0
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
100.0 1 Sequoias 14 100 165 28 3
123.0 2 Fresno City 15 123 230 34 3
70.0 3 Porterville 15 70 146 7 1
95.0 4 Merced 15 95 186 40 3
42.0 5 Coalinga 14 42 109 14 1
63.0 6 Reedley 15 63 152 20 6
6 7 Taft - - 0 - -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
502.0 1 Fresno City 15 6 12 8 0 25 43 .58 502
465.0 2 Sequoias 14 4 2 23 3 110 57 1.93 465
470.0 3 Porterville 15 7 3 13 1 31 29 1.07 470
487.0 4 Merced 15 12 5 2 0 32 76 .42 487
410.0 5 Coalinga 14 7 3 11 0 13 15 .87 410
471.0 6 Reedley 15 11 1 12 0 27 40 .68 471
0 7 Taft - - - - - - - - 0
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
6.080808080808081 1 Reedley 15 15 99.0 130 111 86 6.08
5.965909090909091 2 Coalinga 14 14 88.0 135 112 75 5.97
4.2145328719723185 3 Merced 15 15 96.1 116 69 58 4.21
5.268817204301075 4 Porterville 15 15 93.0 161 106 70 5.27
3.099630996309963 5 Sequoias 14 14 90.1 92 52 40 3.10
2.7263157894736842 6 Fresno City 15 15 95.0 106 47 37 2.73
0.0 7 Taft - - 0.0 - - - 0.00
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
2.0202020202020203 1 Reedley 15 15 42 2.97 3 2.02
2.0568181818181817 2 Coalinga 14 14 69 5.49 9 2.06
2.032258064516129 3 Porterville 15 15 33 2.48 1 2.03
1.6920415224913496 4 Merced 15 15 67 4.87 3 1.69
1.5498154981549817 5 Sequoias 14 14 78 6.04 1 1.55
1.4631578947368422 6 Fresno City 15 15 42 3.09 0 1.46
0.0 7 Taft - - - .00 - 0.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9693877551020408 1 Fresno City 15 392 283 97 12 2 .969
0.9358600583090378 2 Sequoias 14 343 259 62 22 3 .936
0.9432098765432099 3 Merced 15 405 289 93 23 3 .943
0.9258241758241759 4 Reedley 15 364 285 52 27 2 .926
0.9235807860262009 5 Porterville 15 458 284 139 35 9 .924
0.8940217391304348 6 Coalinga 14 368 264 65 39 7 .894
.894 7 Taft - 0 - - - - -
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.1111111111111111 1 Fresno City 15 3 8 1 .111 0
0.125 2 Sequoias 14 1 28 4 .125 0
0.1111111111111111 3 Merced 15 2 24 3 .111 0
0.0 4 Coalinga 14 0 20 0 .000 0
0.03571428571428571 5 Reedley 15 1 27 1 .036 0
0.0 6 Porterville 15 0 35 0 .000 0
0 7 Taft - - - - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
50.0 1 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
0.0 2 Coalinga 6.0 0 0
0 3 Fresno City 6.0 - -
0.0 4 Merced 7.0 0 0
0.0 4 Porterville 6.0 0 0
0.0 4 Reedley 9.0 0 0
0 7 Taft - - -