California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
9.0 1	Porterville	36	947	296	152	111	133	.313	.389	.421
24.0 2	Fresno City	40	1099	340	229	133	170	.309	.387	.479
9.0 3	Sequoias	32	821	247	133	65	128	.301	.369	.418
4.0 4	Merced	38	977	277	162	114	184	.284	.368	.372
3.0 5	Reedley	30	738	200	95	70	101	.271	.341	.346
3.0 5	Taft	37	948	249	105	93	138	.263	.337	.328
.328 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
24.0 1	Fresno City	40	84	15	24	123
9.0 2	Porterville	36	56	10	9	75
9.0 2	Sequoias	32	57	6	9	72
4.0 4	Merced	38	50	12	4	66
3.0 5	Reedley	30	36	5	3	44
3.0 5	Taft	37	37	8	3	48
48 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
24.0 1	Fresno City	40	252	526	81	14
4.0 2	Merced	38	179	363	31	11
9.0 3	Porterville	36	168	399	46	4
9.0 3	Sequoias	32	148	343	19	6
3.0 5	Taft	37	134	311	31	11
3.0 5	Reedley	30	120	255	39	9
9 7	Coalinga	-	-	0	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
24.0 1	Fresno City	40	12	8	26	0	94	87	1.08	1278
4.0 2	Merced	38	22	9	6	0	141	207	.68	1128
3.0 3	Taft	37	17	8	28	5	126	131	.96	1094
9.0 4	Porterville	36	12	6	11	3	52	85	.61	1087
9.0 4	Sequoias	32	26	5	25	6	156	132	1.18	942
3.0 6	Reedley	30	11	5	10	6	105	114	.92	834
834 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
9.0 1	Sequoias	32	32	190.1	258	215	172	6.33
9.0 1	Porterville	36	36	204.2	361	251	184	6.29
3.0 3	Reedley	30	30	181.2	317	201	148	5.70
4.0 4	Merced	38	38	238.0	274	208	170	5.00
3.0 5	Taft	37	37	234.0	347	224	159	4.76
24.0 6	Fresno City	40	40	271.2	261	124	110	2.83
2.83 7	Coalinga	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	0.00

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
3.0 1	Reedley	30	30	63	2.43	16	2.11
9.0 2	Porterville	36	36	62	2.12	13	2.09
9.0 2	Sequoias	32	32	97	3.57	12	1.98
3.0 4	Taft	37	37	154	4.61	11	1.87
4.0 5	Merced	38	38	147	4.32	13	1.55
24.0 6	Fresno City	40	40	160	4.12	11	1.41
1.41 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	.00	-	0.00

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
24.0 1	Fresno City	40	1148	815	302	31	9	.973
4.0 2	Merced	38	948	676	213	59	30	.938
9.0 3	Sequoias	32	874	569	246	59	20	.932
3.0 4	Taft	37	1033	702	253	78	19	.924
9.0 5	Porterville	36	995	633	282	80	31	.920
3.0 6	Reedley	30	724	502	160	62	6	.914
.914 7	Coalinga	-	0	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
24.0 1	Fresno City	40	13	27	16	.372	1
3.0 2	Taft	37	13	58	13	.183	0
3.0 2	Reedley	30	9	33	7	.175	0
9.0 4	Sequoias	32	5	85	7	.076	4
4.0 5	Merced	38	4	73	5	.064	1
9.0 6	Porterville	36	4	50	3	.057	1
1 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
3.0 1	Reedley	13.0	763	59
9.0 2	Sequoias	13.0	650	50
24.0 3	Fresno City	20.0	0	0
9.0 4	Porterville	13.0	0	0
4.0 5	Merced	19.0	0	0
3.0 6	Taft	16.0	-	-
- 7	Coalinga	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
3.0 1	Porterville	15	380	115	65	58	54	.303	.402	.416
11.0 2	Fresno City	15	409	149	115	63	44	.364	.455	.589
5.0 3	Sequoias	15	401	125	62	35	55	.312	.384	.446
4.0 4	Merced	16	453	154	95	39	55	.340	.402	.466
1.0 5	Reedley	15	386	94	38	31	55	.244	.308	.306
2.0 6	Taft	15	372	84	35	30	58	.226	.291	.293
.293 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
11.0 1	Fresno City	15	35	12	11	58
3.0 2	Porterville	15	28	3	3	34
5.0 3	Sequoias	15	33	3	5	41
4.0 4	Merced	16	29	8	4	41
1.0 5	Reedley	15	17	2	1	20
2.0 6	Taft	15	15	2	2	19
19 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
11.0 1	Fresno City	15	125	241	46	3
4.0 2	Merced	16	102	211	16	5
3.0 3	Porterville	15	73	158	20	1
5.0 4	Sequoias	15	67	179	9	3
2.0 5	Taft	15	42	109	12	6
1.0 6	Reedley	15	49	118	23	6
6 7	Coalinga	-	-	0	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
11.0 1	Fresno City	15	8	3	12	0	24	27	.89	495
4.0 2	Merced	16	12	6	3	0	68	101	.67	513
2.0 3	Taft	15	6	4	8	1	33	45	.73	420
3.0 4	Porterville	15	8	4	3	0	11	28	.39	453
5.0 5	Sequoias	15	13	2	15	2	79	64	1.23	466
1.0 6	Reedley	15	6	2	6	3	59	64	.92	431
431 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
5.0 1	Sequoias	15	15	95.1	116	85	70	5.14
3.0 2	Porterville	15	15	88.0	155	108	74	5.89
1.0 3	Reedley	15	15	94.0	162	107	84	6.26
4.0 4	Merced	16	16	106.2	92	60	49	3.22
2.0 5	Taft	15	15	99.0	126	68	50	3.54
11.0 6	Fresno City	15	15	95.2	72	28	26	1.90
1.90 7	Coalinga	-	-	0.0	-	-	-	0.00

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
1.0 1	Reedley	15	15	23	1.71	9	2.19
3.0 2	Porterville	15	15	37	2.94	6	2.10
5.0 3	Sequoias	15	15	51	3.74	4	1.83
2.0 4	Taft	15	15	62	4.38	3	1.61
4.0 5	Merced	16	16	87	5.71	1	1.27
11.0 6	Fresno City	15	15	62	4.54	3	1.18
1.18 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	.00	-	0.00

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
11.0 1	Fresno City	15	394	287	97	10	1	.975
4.0 2	Merced	16	439	320	97	22	10	.950
5.0 3	Sequoias	15	414	284	108	22	7	.947
2.0 4	Taft	15	444	297	118	29	6	.935
3.0 5	Porterville	15	419	265	116	38	15	.909
1.0 6	Reedley	15	408	282	96	30	4	.926
.926 7	Coalinga	-	0	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
11.0 1	Fresno City	15	1	2	8	.800	1
2.0 2	Taft	15	6	26	8	.235	0
1.0 3	Reedley	15	5	16	1	.059	0
5.0 4	Sequoias	15	2	39	4	.093	0
4.0 5	Merced	16	2	16	1	.059	0
3.0 6	Porterville	15	3	26	1	.037	0
0 7	Coalinga	-	-	-	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
1.0 1	Reedley	5.0	421	85
5.0 2	Sequoias	7.0	350	50
11.0 3	Fresno City	8.0	-	-
3.0 4	Porterville	8.0	0	0
4.0 5	Merced	8.0	0	0
2.0 6	Taft	8.0	-	-
- 7	Coalinga	-	-	-