Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
16.754901960784313 1 Fresno City 30 102 1290 12.65 500 3625 .218 1227 12.03 1709.0 16.8
14.790697674418604 2 Sequoias 23 86 920 10.70 422 2741 .182 774 9.00 1272.0 14.8
13.430232558139535 3 Merced 23 86 863 10.03 507 2723 .131 742 8.63 1155.0 13.4
12.936274509803921 4 Taft 28 102 1012 9.92 400 3453 .177 886 8.69 1319.5 12.9
12.76923076923077 5 Reedley 24 91 880 9.67 550 3444 .096 815 8.96 1162.0 12.8
12.225806451612904 6 Coalinga 25 93 822 8.84 561 2998 .087 816 8.77 1137.0 12.2
12.111650485436893 7 Cerro Coso 27 103 934 9.07 478 3155 .145 848 8.23 1247.5 12.1
9.808988764044944 8 Columbia 24 89 657 7.38 55 383 1.572 573 6.44 873.0 9.8
9.734177215189874 9 Porterville 22 79 551 6.97 371 1930 .093 485 6.14 769.0 9.7
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
12.936274509803921 1 Taft 28 102 1958 19.20 101 97 150 1.47
16.754901960784313 2 Fresno City 30 102 1938 19.00 43 146 116 1.14
12.225806451612904 3 Coalinga 25 93 1550 16.67 62 104 114 1.23
12.111650485436893 4 Cerro Coso 27 103 1484 14.41 76 13 83 0.80
14.790697674418604 5 Sequoias 23 86 1348 15.67 154 64 186 2.16
9.808988764044944 6 Columbia 24 89 1265 14.21 119 0 119 1.34
9.734177215189874 7 Porterville 22 79 1062 13.44 110 0 110 1.39
13.430232558139535 8 Merced 23 86 921 10.71 47 140 117 1.36
12.76923076923077 9 Reedley 24 91 806 8.86 64 28 78 0.86
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
16.754901960784313 1 Fresno City 30 102 303 2.97 1513 105
12.111650485436893 2 Cerro Coso 27 103 231 2.24 1561 234
12.76923076923077 3 Reedley 24 91 204 2.24 1768 256
12.225806451612904 4 Coalinga 25 93 201 2.16 1 121
13.430232558139535 5 Merced 23 86 175 2.03 0 0
14.790697674418604 6 Sequoias 23 86 166 1.93 1552 202
12.936274509803921 7 Taft 28 102 158 1.55 1799 220
9.734177215189874 8 Porterville 22 79 108 1.37 0 0
9.808988764044944 9 Columbia 24 89 97 1.09 1147 46
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
18.08 1 Fresno City 16 50 661 13.22 218 1664 .266 622 12.44 904.0 18.1
15.204918032786885 2 Sequoias 16 61 697 11.43 300 2016 .197 580 9.51 927.5 15.2
13.868852459016393 3 Merced 16 61 630 10.33 351 2054 .136 541 8.87 846.0 13.9
13.456896551724139 4 Taft 16 58 599 10.33 241 1945 .184 537 9.26 780.5 13.5
12.806451612903226 5 Reedley 16 62 616 9.94 373 2341 .104 571 9.21 794.0 12.8
11.827586206896552 6 Coalinga 16 58 488 8.41 361 1864 .068 483 8.33 686.0 11.8
12.8515625 7 Cerro Coso 16 64 630 9.84 318 2182 .143 576 9.00 822.5 12.9
8.903225806451612 8 Columbia 16 62 433 6.98 14 119 3.521 370 5.97 552.0 8.9
9.716666666666667 9 Porterville 16 60 418 6.97 291 1487 .085 369 6.15 583.0 9.7
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
13.456896551724139 1 Taft 16 58 1154 19.90 64 63 96 1.65
18.08 2 Fresno City 16 50 1001 20.02 23 76 61 1.22
11.827586206896552 3 Coalinga 16 58 962 16.59 44 68 78 1.34
12.8515625 4 Cerro Coso 16 64 953 14.89 47 3 49 0.76
15.204918032786885 5 Sequoias 16 61 950 15.57 99 35 117 1.91
8.903225806451612 6 Columbia 16 62 754 12.16 81 0 81 1.31
9.716666666666667 7 Porterville 16 60 866 14.43 88 0 88 1.47
13.868852459016393 8 Merced 16 61 668 10.95 39 106 92 1.51
12.806451612903226 9 Reedley 16 62 517 8.34 49 20 59 0.95
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
18.08 1 Fresno City 16 50 182 3.64 641 44
12.8515625 2 Cerro Coso 16 64 144 2.25 1032 137
12.806451612903226 3 Reedley 16 62 119 1.92 1286 161
11.827586206896552 4 Coalinga 16 58 120 2.07 1 81
13.868852459016393 5 Merced 16 61 124 2.03 0 0
15.204918032786885 6 Sequoias 16 61 114 1.87 1079 125
13.456896551724139 7 Taft 16 58 86 1.48 975 117
9.716666666666667 8 Porterville 16 60 77 1.28 0 0
8.903225806451612 9 Columbia 16 62 38 0.61 607 18