Team Stats

Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
12.647058823529411 1 Fresno City 30 102 1290 12.65 500 3625 .218 1227 12.03 1709.0 16.8
10.69767441860465 2 Sequoias 23 86 920 10.70 422 2741 .182 774 9.00 1272.0 14.8
10.034883720930232 3 Merced 23 86 863 10.03 507 2723 .131 742 8.63 1155.0 13.4
9.92156862745098 4 Taft 28 102 1012 9.92 400 3453 .177 886 8.69 1319.5 12.9
9.67032967032967 5 Reedley 24 91 880 9.67 550 3444 .096 815 8.96 1162.0 12.8
9.067961165048544 6 Cerro Coso 27 103 934 9.07 478 3155 .145 848 8.23 1247.5 12.1
8.838709677419354 7 Coalinga 25 93 822 8.84 561 2998 .087 816 8.77 1137.0 12.2
7.382022471910112 8 Columbia 24 89 657 7.38 55 383 1.572 573 6.44 873.0 9.8
6.974683544303797 9 Porterville 22 79 551 6.97 371 1930 .093 485 6.14 769.0 9.7
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
9.92156862745098 1 Taft 28 102 1958 19.20 101 97 150 1.47
12.647058823529411 2 Fresno City 30 102 1938 19.00 43 146 116 1.14
8.838709677419354 3 Coalinga 25 93 1550 16.67 62 104 114 1.23
9.067961165048544 4 Cerro Coso 27 103 1484 14.41 76 13 83 0.80
10.69767441860465 5 Sequoias 23 86 1348 15.67 154 64 186 2.16
7.382022471910112 6 Columbia 24 89 1265 14.21 119 0 119 1.34
6.974683544303797 7 Porterville 22 79 1062 13.44 110 0 110 1.39
10.034883720930232 8 Merced 23 86 921 10.71 47 140 117 1.36
9.67032967032967 9 Reedley 24 91 806 8.86 64 28 78 0.86
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
12.647058823529411 1 Fresno City 30 102 303 2.97 1513 105
9.067961165048544 2 Cerro Coso 27 103 231 2.24 1561 234
9.67032967032967 3 Reedley 24 91 204 2.24 1768 256
8.838709677419354 4 Coalinga 25 93 201 2.16 1 121
10.034883720930232 5 Merced 23 86 175 2.03 0 0
10.69767441860465 6 Sequoias 23 86 166 1.93 1552 202
9.92156862745098 7 Taft 28 102 158 1.55 1799 220
6.974683544303797 8 Porterville 22 79 108 1.37 0 0
7.382022471910112 9 Columbia 24 89 97 1.09 1147 46
Rk Team m s k k/s e ta pct a a/s pts pts/s
13.22 1 Fresno City 16 50 661 13.22 218 1664 .266 622 12.44 904.0 18.1
11.426229508196721 2 Sequoias 16 61 697 11.43 300 2016 .197 580 9.51 927.5 15.2
10.327868852459016 3 Merced 16 61 630 10.33 351 2054 .136 541 8.87 846.0 13.9
10.327586206896552 4 Taft 16 58 599 10.33 241 1945 .184 537 9.26 780.5 13.5
9.935483870967742 5 Reedley 16 62 616 9.94 373 2341 .104 571 9.21 794.0 12.8
9.84375 6 Cerro Coso 16 64 630 9.84 318 2182 .143 576 9.00 822.5 12.9
8.413793103448276 7 Coalinga 16 58 488 8.41 361 1864 .068 483 8.33 686.0 11.8
6.983870967741935 8 Columbia 16 62 433 6.98 14 119 3.521 370 5.97 552.0 8.9
6.966666666666667 9 Porterville 16 60 418 6.97 291 1487 .085 369 6.15 583.0 9.7
Rk Team m s digs d/s bs ba tot b/s
10.327586206896552 1 Taft 16 58 1154 19.90 64 63 96 1.65
13.22 2 Fresno City 16 50 1001 20.02 23 76 61 1.22
8.413793103448276 3 Coalinga 16 58 962 16.59 44 68 78 1.34
9.84375 4 Cerro Coso 16 64 953 14.89 47 3 49 0.76
11.426229508196721 5 Sequoias 16 61 950 15.57 99 35 117 1.91
6.983870967741935 6 Columbia 16 62 754 12.16 81 0 81 1.31
6.966666666666667 7 Porterville 16 60 866 14.43 88 0 88 1.47
10.327868852459016 8 Merced 16 61 668 10.95 39 106 92 1.51
9.935483870967742 9 Reedley 16 62 517 8.34 49 20 59 0.95
Rk Team m s sa sa/s r re
13.22 1 Fresno City 16 50 182 3.64 641 44
9.84375 2 Cerro Coso 16 64 144 2.25 1032 137
9.935483870967742 3 Reedley 16 62 119 1.92 1286 161
8.413793103448276 4 Coalinga 16 58 120 2.07 1 81
10.327868852459016 5 Merced 16 61 124 2.03 0 0
11.426229508196721 6 Sequoias 16 61 114 1.87 1079 125
10.327586206896552 7 Taft 16 58 86 1.48 975 117
6.966666666666667 8 Porterville 16 60 77 1.28 0 0
6.983870967741935 9 Columbia 16 62 38 0.61 607 18