Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
8.121212121212121 1 Merced 33 1077-2565 42.0 268-812 33.0 382-583 65.5 85.0
6.53125 2 Sequoias 32 929-2302 40.4 209-724 28.9 333-534 62.4 75.0
8.866666666666667 3 Fresno City 30 797-2029 39.3 266-887 30.0 384-564 68.1 74.9
3.857142857142857 4 Reedley 28 653-1811 36.1 108-462 23.4 413-636 64.9 65.3
4.375 5 Taft 24 457-1489 30.7 105-452 23.2 243-443 54.9 52.6
3.923076923076923 6 Lemoore 26 446-1255 35.5 102-357 28.6 339-536 63.2 52.5
3.1923076923076925 7 Porterville 26 462-1596 28.9 83-435 19.1 190-415 45.8 46.0
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
6.53125 1 Sequoias 32 18.9 29.7 48.6 12.6
8.121212121212121 2 Merced 33 18.5 26.2 44.6 8.1
3.857142857142857 3 Reedley 28 16.6 25.5 42.1 6.8
3.1923076923076925 4 Porterville 26 14.3 23.7 38.0 -6.3
8.866666666666667 5 Fresno City 30 13.2 23.8 37.1 0.5
3.923076923076923 6 Lemoore 26 11.7 26.2 37.9 -1.0
4.375 7 Taft 24 7.9 18.0 26.0 -26.4
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
3.1923076923076925 1 Porterville 26 27.8 16.5 3.0 9.6
4.375 2 Taft 24 19.5 12.3 2.8 6.6
8.866666666666667 3 Fresno City 30 17.5 8.5 3.1 13.8
6.53125 4 Sequoias 32 17.1 7.0 1.8 15.3
3.923076923076923 5 Lemoore 26 16.6 12.0 3.7 12.8
3.857142857142857 6 Reedley 28 15.4 9.9 2.7 12.9
8.121212121212121 7 Merced 33 13.6 7.0 3.0 18.6
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
8.121212121212121 1 Merced 33 17.0 1.039 0.355
6.53125 2 Sequoias 32 18.3 0.956 0.306
8.866666666666667 3 Fresno City 30 17.9 0.921 0.118
3.857142857142857 4 Reedley 28 17.5 0.872 0.077
3.923076923076923 5 Lemoore 26 18.3 0.827 0.015
4.375 6 Taft 24 17.0 0.634 -0.296
3.1923076923076925 7 Porterville 26 17.2 0.556 -0.322
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
4.375 1 Taft 24 726-1769 41.0 142-499 28.5 78.3
3.1923076923076925 2 Porterville 26 684-1774 38.6 134-454 29.5 70.3
3.857142857142857 3 Reedley 28 633-1675 37.8 190-630 30.2 63.9
8.866666666666667 4 Fresno City 30 693-1750 39.6 149-540 27.6 63.5
3.923076923076923 5 Lemoore 26 553-1575 35.1 128-514 24.9 61.2
8.121212121212121 6 Merced 33 676-1927 35.1 122-520 23.5 54.8
6.53125 7 Sequoias 32 553-1816 30.5 121-504 24.0 50.3
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
4.375 1 Taft 24 18.8 33.5 52.4 -26.4
3.1923076923076925 2 Porterville 26 16.8 27.5 44.3 -6.3
8.121212121212121 3 Merced 33 11.0 25.5 36.5 8.1
3.923076923076923 4 Lemoore 26 13.4 25.5 38.9 -1.0
8.866666666666667 5 Fresno City 30 11.5 25.0 36.6 0.5
6.53125 6 Sequoias 32 11.4 24.6 36.0 12.6
3.857142857142857 7 Reedley 28 11.4 23.9 35.3 6.8
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
8.121212121212121 1 Merced 33 24.1 14.2 1.3 10.1
8.866666666666667 2 Fresno City 30 23.3 14.2 1.7 13.5
3.857142857142857 3 Reedley 28 22.6 12.2 3.2 14.4
6.53125 4 Sequoias 32 22.3 12.8 3.3 7.2
4.375 5 Taft 24 19.7 10.5 1.0 16.5
3.1923076923076925 6 Porterville 26 18.7 11.5 4.1 14.0
3.923076923076923 7 Lemoore 26 17.3 5.7 1.5 12.1
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
3.923076923076923 1 Lemoore 26 19.2 0.812 0.015
3.857142857142857 2 Reedley 28 18.7 0.794 0.077
4.375 3 Taft 24 17.4 0.931 -0.296
8.866666666666667 4 Fresno City 30 16.8 0.803 0.118
8.121212121212121 5 Merced 33 16.3 0.685 0.355
6.53125 6 Sequoias 32 15.5 0.650 0.306
3.1923076923076925 7 Porterville 26 15.2 0.878 -0.322
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct ft pct pts
9.0 1 Merced 12 411-896 45.9 108-295 36.6 136-201 67.7 88.8
6.25 2 Sequoias 12 376-863 43.6 75-269 27.9 122-183 66.7 79.1
9.0 3 Fresno City 12 345-844 40.9 108-347 31.1 164-231 71.0 80.4
3.5 4 Reedley 12 281-801 35.1 42-189 22.2 175-263 66.5 64.9
4.666666666666667 5 Taft 12 195-688 28.3 56-216 25.9 106-198 53.5 46.0
4.0 6 Lemoore 12 174-495 35.2 48-159 30.2 148-228 64.9 49.1
3.25 7 Porterville 12 193-689 28.0 39-198 19.7 81-167 48.5 42.2
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
6.25 1 Sequoias 12 17.8 29.6 47.4 13.3
9.0 2 Merced 12 16.9 28.6 45.5 13.8
3.5 3 Reedley 12 17.6 23.8 41.3 8.1
3.25 4 Porterville 12 13.5 24.1 37.6 -3.4
9.0 5 Fresno City 12 12.5 24.2 36.7 2.3
4.0 6 Lemoore 12 9.2 25.0 34.2 -4.8
4.666666666666667 7 Taft 12 5.7 16.8 22.4 -29.3
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
3.25 1 Porterville 12 33.1 20.7 3.0 9.7
4.666666666666667 2 Taft 12 19.7 12.8 2.8 4.9
9.0 3 Fresno City 12 18.8 8.1 2.0 14.1
6.25 4 Sequoias 12 18.4 8.2 1.8 16.4
4.0 5 Lemoore 12 17.8 13.2 3.6 12.3
3.5 6 Reedley 12 14.7 9.9 2.8 12.2
9.0 7 Merced 12 15.1 7.2 1.7 21.3
Rk Team gp pf off eff net eff
9.0 1 Merced 12 14.9 1.094 0.465
6.25 2 Sequoias 12 16.3 0.987 0.372
9.0 3 Fresno City 12 17.4 0.933 0.054
3.5 4 Reedley 12 16.9 0.868 0.040
4.0 5 Lemoore 12 16.1 0.827 -0.008
4.666666666666667 6 Taft 12 16.2 0.578 -0.456
3.25 7 Porterville 12 15.4 0.502 -0.455
Rk Team gp fg pct 3pt pct pts
4.666666666666667 1 Taft 12 378-917 41.2 90-294 30.6 82.8
3.25 2 Porterville 12 361-858 42.1 73-234 31.2 78.1
3.5 3 Reedley 12 277-702 39.5 89-277 32.1 65.0
9.0 4 Fresno City 12 277-673 41.2 61-186 32.8 65.5
4.0 5 Lemoore 12 263-764 34.4 71-292 24.3 61.7
9.0 6 Merced 12 221-688 32.1 38-188 20.2 49.1
6.25 7 Sequoias 12 198-674 29.4 54-202 26.7 48.4
Rk Team gp off def reb mrgn
4.666666666666667 1 Taft 12 19.8 31.8 51.7 -29.3
3.25 2 Porterville 12 16.2 24.8 41.0 -3.4
9.0 3 Merced 12 9.7 22.0 31.7 13.8
4.0 4 Lemoore 12 14.7 24.3 39.0 -4.8
9.0 5 Fresno City 12 11.2 23.2 34.3 2.3
6.25 6 Sequoias 12 11.8 22.4 34.2 13.3
3.5 7 Reedley 12 9.9 23.3 33.3 8.1
Rk Team gp to stl blk ast
9.0 1 Merced 12 22.8 14.8 1.5 8.4
9.0 1 Fresno City 12 21.6 16.3 1.8 12.8
3.5 3 Reedley 12 21.2 13.1 3.4 14.7
6.25 4 Sequoias 12 25.3 14.3 3.9 5.8
4.666666666666667 5 Taft 12 14.2 8.5 1.0 19.9
3.25 6 Porterville 12 16.8 8.3 4.3 17.1
4.0 7 Lemoore 12 15.5 4.7 1.8 12.1
Rk Team gp pf def eff net eff
4.0 1 Lemoore 12 19.3 0.835 -0.008
3.5 2 Reedley 12 17.4 0.828 0.040
4.666666666666667 3 Taft 12 15.3 1.034 -0.456
9.0 4 Fresno City 12 16.6 0.879 0.054
9.0 4 Merced 12 15.4 0.629 0.465
6.25 6 Sequoias 12 14.5 0.615 0.372
3.25 7 Porterville 12 14.8 0.957 -0.455